Product comparison · 2 nas & storage servers

Fujitsu ETERNUS DX80 vs Fujitsu FibreCAT SX80, 2 x 1TB SATA HDD

13specifications compared
10differ
3identical
14known for one product only

Key differences

Total installed storage capacity
- ETERNUS DX80:0.9 TB
- FibreCAT SX80, 2 x 1TB SATA HDD:2 TB
Number of storage drives supported
- ETERNUS DX80:2
- FibreCAT SX80, 2 x 1TB SATA HDD:12
Storage drive capacity
- ETERNUS DX80:450 GB
- FibreCAT SX80, 2 x 1TB SATA HDD:1 TB
Maximum supported storage capacity
- ETERNUS DX80:120 TB
- FibreCAT SX80, 2 x 1TB SATA HDD:42 TB
RAID levels
- ETERNUS DX80:0, 1, 1+0, 5, 6
- FibreCAT SX80, 2 x 1TB SATA HDD:0, 1, 3, 5, 10, 50
Weight
- ETERNUS DX80:35 g
- FibreCAT SX80, 2 x 1TB SATA HDD:30 kg
Operating relative humidity (H-H)
- ETERNUS DX80:20 - 80%
- FibreCAT SX80, 2 x 1TB SATA HDD:10 - 90%
Dimensions (WxDxH)
- ETERNUS DX80:483 x 650 x 88 mm
- FibreCAT SX80, 2 x 1TB SATA HDD:446 x 572 x 88 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of ETERNUS DX80, FibreCAT SX80, 2 x 1TB SATA HDD
27 specifications	A Fujitsu ETERNUS DX80 View product	B Fujitsu FibreCAT SX80, 2 x 1TB SATA HDD View product
Storage5 differ
Total installed storage capacityDiffers	0.9 TB	2 TB
Number of storage drives supportedDiffers	2	12
Storage drive capacityDiffers	450 GB	1 TB
Storage drive interfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Serial ATA
HDD speedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	7200 RPM
Maximum supported storage capacityDiffers	120 TB	42 TB
RAID levelsDiffers	0, 1, 1+0, 5, 6	0, 1, 3, 5, 10, 50
Hot-swap drive baysKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Networkidentical
Maximum data transfer rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	300 Mbit/s
Ports & interfacesidentical
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Designidentical
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Performanceidentical
Management protocolsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	SNMP
Poweridentical
Power supply unit (PSU) capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	650 W
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	3774 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	35 g	30 kg
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs	20 - 80%	10 - 90%
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-40 - 70 °C
Other features3 differ
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Windows 2003R2 (VSS/VDS), Red Hat AS 4.0/5.0, SuSE SLES 9/10, VMware ESX 3.0, 3.0.1/3.0.2, SPARC Solaris 9/10
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	483 x 650 x 88 mm	446 x 572 x 88 mm
Power requirementsDiffers	AC 100 - 120V/200 - 240V @ 50/60Hz	AC 120/230V, 50/60Hz
CertificationDiffers	UL60950-1, CSA60950-1, EN60950-1, IEC60950-1, GOST, FCC Part-15 Class A, ICES-003 Class A, EN55022 Class A, VCCI Class A, AS/NZS CISPR22 Class A, CNS13438(C6357) Class A, C-Tick, BSMI, EN 55024, CE, RoHS, WEEE	CE, UL, VCCI B ITE, GOST, BSMI CNS 13438 B, cUL, EN 60950, GS, ICES-003, IEC 60950, EN 61000-3-3, EN55024, EN55022 B, CB, AS/NZ 3548 B, FCC 15 B, CSA C22.2, RoHS, EN300-386
Networking featuresKnown for one	Gigabit Ethernet	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cache internalKnown for one	1024 MB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Processoridentical
Processor frequencyKnown for one	1.2 GHz	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More nas & storage servers comparisons

All nas & storage servers comparisons