Product comparison · 2 nas & storage servers

Fujitsu ETERNUS DX60 vs Fujitsu NetApp FAS2020-BNDL9 Rack (2U)

Add a product
  • 10specifications compared
  • 9differ
  • 1identical
  • 23known for one product only

Key differences

  • Total installed storage capacity
    • ETERNUS DX60:2 TB
    • NetApp FAS2020-BNDL9 Rack (2U):3.6 TB
  • Number of storage drives installed
    • ETERNUS DX60:2
    • NetApp FAS2020-BNDL9 Rack (2U):12
  • Number of storage drives supported
    • ETERNUS DX60:2
    • NetApp FAS2020-BNDL9 Rack (2U):68
  • Storage drive capacity
    • ETERNUS DX60:1 TB
    • NetApp FAS2020-BNDL9 Rack (2U):300 GB
  • Storage drive interface
    • ETERNUS DX60:Serial ATA
    • NetApp FAS2020-BNDL9 Rack (2U):Serial Attached SCSI (SAS)
  • Maximum supported storage capacity
    • ETERNUS DX60:24 TB
    • NetApp FAS2020-BNDL9 Rack (2U):68 TB
  • RAID levels
    • ETERNUS DX60:0, 1, 1+0, 5, 6
    • NetApp FAS2020-BNDL9 Rack (2U):1, 4
  • Weight
    • ETERNUS DX60:35 g
    • NetApp FAS2020-BNDL9 Rack (2U):27 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of ETERNUS DX60, FAS2020-BNDL9
33 specifications
Storage7 differ
Total installed storage capacityDiffers2 TB3.6 TB
Number of storage drives installedDiffers212
Number of storage drives supportedDiffers268
Storage drive capacityDiffers1 TB300 GB
Storage drive interfaceDiffersSerial ATASerial Attached SCSI (SAS)
Maximum supported storage capacityDiffers24 TB68 TB
RAID levelsDiffers0, 1, 1+0, 5, 61, 4
HDD speedKnown for one7200 RPMUnknown — not stated by the source
Networkidentical
iSCSI supportKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Data link protocolsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceFCP, iSCSI, NFS, CIFS
Maximum data transfer rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100 Mbit/s
Supported network protocolsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBase-T Ethernet
Ports & interfacesidentical
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4
Designidentical
Chassis typeRack (2U)Rack (2U)
Number of fansKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 fan(s)
Performanceidentical
Web-based managementKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Softwareidentical
Bundled softwareKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceProtection Pack, Foundation Pack, Application Pack, Advanced Pack
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers35 g27 kg
Other features1 differ
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source- Windows 2000, Server 2003, XP; - Linux, - Sun Solaris, - AIX, - HP-UX, - Mac OS, - VMware ESX
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs483 x 650 x 88 mm449 x 610 x 88 mm
Fibre ChannelKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Interface typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNAS, SAN, iSCSI
Size (imperial)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source48.3 cm (19")
Manageability featuresKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceConsole, Web Browser, SNMP, Tivoli, SAN Manager, HP-Openview, DFM, VFM
Storage mirroringKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Networking featuresKnown for oneGigabit EthernetUnknown — not stated by the source
Power requirementsKnown for oneAC 100 - 120V/200 - 240V @ 50/60HzUnknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for oneUL60950-1, CSA60950-1, EN60950-1, IEC60950-1, GOST, FCC Part-15 Class A, ICES-003 Class A, EN55022 Class A, VCCI Class A, AS/NZS CISPR22 Class A, CNS13438(C6357) Class A, C-Tick, BSMI, EN 55024, CE, RoHS, WEEEUnknown — not stated by the source
Cache internalKnown for one1024 MBUnknown — not stated by the source
Processoridentical
Processor frequencyKnown for one0.8 GHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for one782 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one5 - 40 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one20 - 80%Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More nas & storage servers comparisons

All nas & storage servers comparisons