Product comparison · 2 nas & storage servers

Fujitsu 100 S3 vs Fujitsu ETERNUS DX200 S3 2.5"

37specifications compared
6differ
31identical
3known for one product only

Key differences

Number of storage drives supported
- 100 S3:2
- ETERNUS DX200 S3 2.5":24
Storage drive size
- 100 S3:3.5"
- ETERNUS DX200 S3 2.5":2.5"
RAID levels
- 100 S3:1, 1+0, 5, 5+0, 6
- ETERNUS DX200 S3 2.5":0, 1+0, 5, 5+0, 6
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
- 100 S3:1
- ETERNUS DX200 S3 2.5":0
Power supply unit (PSU) capacity
- 100 S3:730 W
- ETERNUS DX200 S3 2.5":690 W
Host interface
- 100 S3:iSCSI
- ETERNUS DX200 S3 2.5":Fibre Channel

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 100 S3, ETERNUS DX200 S3 2.5"
40 specifications	A Fujitsu 100 S3 View product	B Fujitsu ETERNUS DX200 S3 2.5"View product
Storage3 differ
Number of storage drives supportedDiffers	2	24
Storage drive sizeDiffers	3.5"	2.5"
RAID levelsDiffers	1, 1+0, 5, 5+0, 6	0, 1+0, 5, 5+0, 6
Hot-swap drive baysKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Storage drive interfaceKnown for one	Serial Attached SCSI (SAS)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers	1	0
Designidentical
Cooling typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Active
Power1 differ
Power supply unit (PSU) capacityDiffers	730 W	690 W
Other features1 differ
Host interfaceDiffers	iSCSI	Fibre Channel

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More nas & storage servers comparisons

All nas & storage servers comparisons