Product comparison · 2 nas & storage servers

Conceptronic Grab'n'GO NAS Media Store 1.0 TB vs Conceptronic Grab'n'GO Wireless NAS Media Store 400GB

Add a product
  • 19specifications compared
  • 12differ
  • 7identical
  • 5known for one product only

Key differences

The Conceptronic Grab'n'GO NAS Media Store 1.0 TB has 0.6 TB more total installed storage capacity than the Conceptronic Grab'n'GO Wireless NAS Media Store 400GB (1 TB vs 0.4 TB). The Conceptronic Grab'n'GO NAS Media Store 1.0 TB has 1 more storage drives installed than the Conceptronic Grab'n'GO Wireless NAS Media Store 400GB (2 vs 1). The Conceptronic Grab'n'GO NAS Media Store 1.0 TB has 100 GB more storage drive capacity than the Conceptronic Grab'n'GO Wireless NAS Media Store 400GB (500 GB vs 400 GB). Supported network protocols: FTP, HTTP, DHCP, SMTP, NTP on the Conceptronic Grab'n'GO NAS Media Store 1.0 TB, FTP, HTTPs, NTP, TCP/IP on the Conceptronic Grab'n'GO Wireless NAS Media Store 400GB. Storage relative humidity (H-H): 5 - 90% on the Conceptronic Grab'n'GO NAS Media Store 1.0 TB, 5 - 95% on the Conceptronic Grab'n'GO Wireless NAS Media Store 400GB.

  • Total installed storage capacity
    • Grab'n'GO NAS Media Store 1.0 TB:1 TB
    • Grab'n'GO Wireless NAS Media Store 400GB:0.4 TB
  • Number of storage drives installed
    • Grab'n'GO NAS Media Store 1.0 TB:2
    • Grab'n'GO Wireless NAS Media Store 400GB:1
  • Storage drive capacity
    • Grab'n'GO NAS Media Store 1.0 TB:500 GB
    • Grab'n'GO Wireless NAS Media Store 400GB:400 GB
  • Supported network protocols
    • Grab'n'GO NAS Media Store 1.0 TB:FTP, HTTP, DHCP, SMTP, NTP
    • Grab'n'GO Wireless NAS Media Store 400GB:FTP, HTTPs, NTP, TCP/IP
  • USB 2.0 ports quantity
    • Grab'n'GO NAS Media Store 1.0 TB:1
    • Grab'n'GO Wireless NAS Media Store 400GB:2
  • Storage relative humidity (H-H)
    • Grab'n'GO NAS Media Store 1.0 TB:5 - 90%
    • Grab'n'GO Wireless NAS Media Store 400GB:5 - 95%
  • Storage temperature (T-T)
    • Grab'n'GO NAS Media Store 1.0 TB:-20 - 50 °C
    • Grab'n'GO Wireless NAS Media Store 400GB:-20 - 70 °C
  • Networking features
    • Grab'n'GO NAS Media Store 1.0 TB:Gigabit Ethernet
    • Grab'n'GO Wireless NAS Media Store 400GB:WLAN, Gigabit Ethernet

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of Grab'n'GO NAS Media Store 1.0 TB, Grab'n'GO Wireless NAS Media Store 400GB
24 specifications
Storage3 differ
Total installed storage capacityDiffers1 TB0.4 TB
Number of storage drives installedDiffers21
Storage drive capacityDiffers500 GB400 GB
Storage drive size3.5"3.5"
HDD speedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source7200 RPM
Storage drive interfaceKnown for oneSerial ATA IIUnknown — not stated by the source
RAID levelsKnown for one0, 1, JBODUnknown — not stated by the source
Network2 differ
Wi-FiKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Compliance industry standardsDiffersIEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3zIEEE 802.11g, IEEE 802.11b, IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3z
Maximum data transfer rate1000 Mbit/s1000 Mbit/s
Supported network protocolsDiffersFTP, HTTP, DHCP, SMTP, NTPFTP, HTTPs, NTP, TCP/IP
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports11
USB 2.0 ports quantityDiffers12
Performanceidentical
Web-based managementYesYes
Operational conditions2 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)0 - 40 °C0 - 40 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)5 - 90%5 - 90%
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Differs5 - 90%5 - 95%
Storage temperature (T-T)Differs-20 - 50 °C-20 - 70 °C
Other features4 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffersWindows 2000/XP/Vista LinuxWindows 2000/XP/Vista Mac OS X Linux
Minimum system requirementsCD-ROMCD-ROM
Networking featuresDiffersGigabit EthernetWLAN, Gigabit Ethernet
Power requirementsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source12VDC, 3.0A
CertificationDiffersFCC Part 15 Class B, IC, CE, C-tickFCC, CE, C-Tick, IC, LVD
Connectivity LEDsDiffersLAN, HDD1/2LAN, WLAN, HDD, USB

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More nas & storage servers comparisons

All nas & storage servers comparisons