Product comparison · 2 nas & storage servers

Buffalo TS-WVH4.0TL/R1 NAS/storage server Intel Atom® vs Buffalo WS-WV4.0TL/R1 NAS/storage server Intel Atom®

Add a product
  • 15specifications compared
  • 6differ
  • 9identical
  • 22known for one product only

Key differences

  • Storage drive capacity
    • TS-WVH4.0TL/R1 NAS/storage server Intel Atom®:4 TB
    • WS-WV4.0TL/R1 NAS/storage server Intel Atom®:2 TB
  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • TS-WVH4.0TL/R1 NAS/storage server Intel Atom®:41 - 95 °C
    • WS-WV4.0TL/R1 NAS/storage server Intel Atom®:5 - 35 °C
  • Dimensions (WxDxH)
    • TS-WVH4.0TL/R1 NAS/storage server Intel Atom®:170 x 231 x 167 mm
    • WS-WV4.0TL/R1 NAS/storage server Intel Atom®:170 x 230 x 170 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of TS-WVH4.0TL/R1, WS-WV4.0TL/R1
37 specifications
Storage1 differ
Total installed storage capacity4.096 TB4.096 TB
Number of storage drives installed22
Number of storage drives supportedKnown for one2Unknown — not stated by the source
Storage drive capacityDiffers4 TB2 TB
Storage drive interfaceKnown for oneSerial ATAUnknown — not stated by the source
RAID levelsKnown for one1, JBODUnknown — not stated by the source
Drive device, transfer rateKnown for one3000 MB/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum supported storage capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4 TB
Processoridentical
Processor familyIntel Atom®Intel Atom®
Processor frequency1.66 GHz1.66 GHz
Number of processors installedKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Memoryidentical
Internal memoryKnown for one2 GBUnknown — not stated by the source
Network1 differ
Compliance industry standardsKnown for oneIEEE802.3ab / IEEE802.3u / IEEE802.3Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum data transfer rateKnown for one1000 Mbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Supported network protocolsDiffersTCP/IPCIFS/SMB, NFS, LDAP, Active Directory, NTP
Data link protocolsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceTCP/IP
Ports & interfacesidentical
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports22
USB 2.0 ports quantity22
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1) Type-A ports quantity22
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityKnown for one0Unknown — not stated by the source
HDMI ports quantityKnown for one0Unknown — not stated by the source
USB 1.1 ports quantityKnown for one0Unknown — not stated by the source
WAN connectionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceEthernet (RJ-45)
eSATAKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Designidentical
Display typeLCDLCD
Performance1 differ
Management protocolsDiffersHTTP/HTTPSRemote Desktop Connection (RDP), Terminal Services Client
Security algorithmsKnown for one128-bit AES, HTTPSUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensionsidentical
Weight4.5 kg4.5 kg
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs41 - 95 °C5 - 35 °C
Other features2 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffersWindows 7 (32-bit/64-bit), Windows Vista (32-bit/64-bit), Windows XP, Windows 2000, Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2003, Windows 2000 ServerWindows Operating Systems, Mac OS Windows 7 (32-bit/64-bit), Windows Vista (32-bit/64-bit), Windows XP, Windows 2000, Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2003, Windows 2000 Server
Digital Living Network Alliance (DLNA) certifiedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs170 x 231 x 167 mm170 x 230 x 170 mm
Networking featuresKnown for oneGigabit EthernetUnknown — not stated by the source
Power requirementsKnown for oneHTTP/HTTPSUnknown — not stated by the source
Supported protocolsKnown for one- TCP/IP - CIFS/SMB, AFP, HTTP/HTTPS, FTP/SFTP/FTPS, NFS - LDAP, Active Directory - HTTP/HTTPS - NTPUnknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for oneDLNAUnknown — not stated by the source
Data transfer rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 Gbit/s

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More nas & storage servers comparisons

All nas & storage servers comparisons