Product comparison · 2 nas & storage servers

Buffalo TS-RX TeraStation III Rackmount vs Fujitsu CELVIN NAS Servers Q700

13specifications compared
11differ
2identical
14known for one product only

Key differences

Number of storage drives installed
- TS-RX TeraStation III Rackmount:4
- CELVIN NAS Servers Q700:2
Storage drive capacity
- TS-RX TeraStation III Rackmount:500 GB
- CELVIN NAS Servers Q700:1 TB
RAID levels
- TS-RX TeraStation III Rackmount:0, 1, 5, 10
- CELVIN NAS Servers Q700:0, 1
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
- TS-RX TeraStation III Rackmount:2
- CELVIN NAS Servers Q700:1
USB 2.0 ports quantity
- TS-RX TeraStation III Rackmount:2
- CELVIN NAS Servers Q700:3
Weight
- TS-RX TeraStation III Rackmount:12 kg
- CELVIN NAS Servers Q700:1.36 kg
Operating temperature (T-T)
- TS-RX TeraStation III Rackmount:5 - 35 °C
- CELVIN NAS Servers Q700:0 - 40 °C
Dimensions (WxDxH)
- TS-RX TeraStation III Rackmount:430 x 420 x 443 mm
- CELVIN NAS Servers Q700:85 x 218.4 x 165.5 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of TS-RX TeraStation III Rackmount, CELVIN NAS Servers Q700
27 specifications	A Buffalo TS-RX TeraStation III Rackmount View product	B Fujitsu CELVIN NAS Servers Q700 View product
Storage3 differ
Number of storage drives installedDiffers	4	2
Storage drive capacityDiffers	500 GB	1 TB
RAID levelsDiffers	0, 1, 5, 10	0, 1
Supported file systemsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	EXT3
Processoridentical
Processor frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.2 GHz
Memoryidentical
Internal memoryKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.5 GB
Flash memoryKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16 MB
Network1 differ
Supported network protocolsDiffers	SMB/CIFS, AFP, FTP/FTPS, SFTP, HTTP/HTTPS, NFS, TCP/IP	TCP/IP, DHCP client, DHCP server, CIFS/SMB, AFP. NFS v3, HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, DDNS, NTP, Gigabit Jumbo Frame, Bonjour
Compliance industry standardsKnown for one	IEEE802.3ab/IEEE802.3u/IEEE802.3	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum data transfer rateKnown for one	1000 Mbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers	2	1
USB 2.0 ports quantityDiffers	2	3
Poweridentical
Power supply unit (PSU) capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	60 W
Power consumption (sleep)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	9 W
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	12 kg	1.36 kg
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	5 - 35 °C	0 - 40 °C
Other features3 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffers	Win 2000, XP, Vista, MCE 2004/05, Win Server 2000/2003/2008 Mac OS X 10.3.9+	Microsoft Windows XP Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Microsoft Windows Vista Microsoft Windows 7 Mac OS X Linux UNIX
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	430 x 420 x 443 mm	85 x 218.4 x 165.5 mm
Link/Act LEDKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power requirementsDiffers	AC 100-240V, 50/60Hz	100 - 240 V
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CE, FCC Class A
Networking featuresKnown for one	Ethernet, Fast Ethernet, Gigabit Ethernet	Unknown — not stated by the source
Non-operating relative humidity (non-condensing)Known for one	20 - 80%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Chassis typeKnown for one	Rack (1U)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Management protocolsKnown for one	HTTP, HTTPS	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More nas & storage servers comparisons

All nas & storage servers comparisons