Product comparison · 2 nas & storage servers

Buffalo TS-RX TeraStation III Rackmount vs Fujitsu CELVIN NAS Servers Q600

Add a product
  • 12specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 2identical
  • 17known for one product only

Key differences

  • Number of storage drives installed
    • TS-RX TeraStation III Rackmount:4
    • CELVIN NAS Servers Q600:1
  • Storage drive capacity
    • TS-RX TeraStation III Rackmount:500 GB
    • CELVIN NAS Servers Q600:2 TB
  • Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) ports
    • TS-RX TeraStation III Rackmount:2
    • CELVIN NAS Servers Q600:1
  • USB 2.0 ports quantity
    • TS-RX TeraStation III Rackmount:2
    • CELVIN NAS Servers Q600:3
  • Weight
    • TS-RX TeraStation III Rackmount:12 kg
    • CELVIN NAS Servers Q600:680 g
  • Operating temperature (T-T)
    • TS-RX TeraStation III Rackmount:5 - 35 °C
    • CELVIN NAS Servers Q600:0 - 40 °C
  • Dimensions (WxDxH)
    • TS-RX TeraStation III Rackmount:430 x 420 x 443 mm
    • CELVIN NAS Servers Q600:60 x 218.4 x 165.5 mm
  • Power requirements
    • TS-RX TeraStation III Rackmount:AC 100-240V, 50/60Hz
    • CELVIN NAS Servers Q600:100 - 240 V

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of TS-RX TeraStation III Rackmount, CELVIN NAS Servers Q600
29 specifications
Storage2 differ
Total installed storage capacity2 TB2 TB
Number of storage drives installedDiffers41
Storage drive capacityDiffers500 GB2 TB
Storage drive interfaceSerial ATASerial ATA
Storage drive sizeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.5"
Supported file systemsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceEXT3
RAID levelsKnown for one0, 1, 5, 10Unknown — not stated by the source
Processoridentical
Processor frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.2 GHz
Memoryidentical
Internal memoryKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.5 GB
Flash memoryKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source16 MB
Network1 differ
Supported network protocolsDiffersSMB/CIFS, AFP, FTP/FTPS, SFTP, HTTP/HTTPS, NFS, TCP/IPTCP/IP, DHCP client, DHCP server, CIFS/SMB, AFP. NFS v3, HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, DDNS, NTP, Gigabit Jumbo Frame, Bonjour
Compliance industry standardsKnown for oneIEEE802.3ab/IEEE802.3u/IEEE802.3Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum data transfer rateKnown for one1000 Mbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsDiffers21
USB 2.0 ports quantityDiffers23
eSATAKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Poweridentical
Power supply unit (PSU) capacityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source36 W
Power consumption (sleep)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source7 W
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers12 kg680 g
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs5 - 35 °C0 - 40 °C
Other features3 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffersWin 2000, XP, Vista, MCE 2004/05, Win Server 2000/2003/2008 Mac OS X 10.3.9+Microsoft Windows XP Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Microsoft Windows Vista Microsoft Windows 7 Mac OS X Linux UNIX
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs430 x 420 x 443 mm60 x 218.4 x 165.5 mm
Link/Act LEDKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power requirementsDiffersAC 100-240V, 50/60Hz100 - 240 V
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCE, FCC Class A
Networking featuresKnown for oneEthernet, Fast Ethernet, Gigabit EthernetUnknown — not stated by the source
Non-operating relative humidity (non-condensing)Known for one20 - 80%Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Chassis typeKnown for oneRack (1U)Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Management protocolsKnown for oneHTTP, HTTPSUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More nas & storage servers comparisons

All nas & storage servers comparisons