Product comparison · 2 nas & storage servers

Buffalo TeraStation III Rackmount - 6TB vs Fujitsu ETERNUS DX60

11specifications compared
10differ
1identical
17known for one product only

Key differences

Total installed storage capacity
- TeraStation III Rackmount - 6TB:6 TB
- ETERNUS DX60:2 TB
Number of storage drives installed
- TeraStation III Rackmount - 6TB:4
- ETERNUS DX60:2
Storage drive capacity
- TeraStation III Rackmount - 6TB:1.5 TB
- ETERNUS DX60:1 TB
RAID levels
- TeraStation III Rackmount - 6TB:0, 1, 5, 10
- ETERNUS DX60:0, 1, 1+0, 5, 6
Chassis type
- TeraStation III Rackmount - 6TB:Rack (1U)
- ETERNUS DX60:Rack (2U)
Weight
- TeraStation III Rackmount - 6TB:12 kg
- ETERNUS DX60:35 g
Operating temperature (T-T)
- TeraStation III Rackmount - 6TB:5 - 35 °C
- ETERNUS DX60:5 - 40 °C
Dimensions (WxDxH)
- TeraStation III Rackmount - 6TB:430 x 443 x 420 mm
- ETERNUS DX60:483 x 650 x 88 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of TeraStation III Rackmount - 6TB, ETERNUS DX60
28 specifications	A Buffalo TeraStation III Rackmount - 6TB View product	B Fujitsu ETERNUS DX60 View product
Storage4 differ
Total installed storage capacityDiffers	6 TB	2 TB
Number of storage drives installedDiffers	4	2
Storage drive capacityDiffers	1.5 TB	1 TB
Storage drive interface	Serial ATA	Serial ATA
RAID levelsDiffers	0, 1, 5, 10	0, 1, 1+0, 5, 6
Number of storage drives supportedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2
HDD speedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	7200 RPM
Maximum supported storage capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	24 TB
Networkidentical
Compliance industry standardsKnown for one	IEEE802.3ab/IEEE802.3u/IEEE802.3	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum data transfer rateKnown for one	1000 Mbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Supported network protocolsKnown for one	SMB/CIFS, AFP, FTP/FTPS, SFTP, HTTP/HTTPS, NFS, TCP/IP	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Chassis typeDiffers	Rack (1U)	Rack (2U)
Performanceidentical
Management protocolsKnown for one	HTTP, HTTPS	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers	12 kg	35 g
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)Differs	5 - 35 °C	5 - 40 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20 - 80%
Other features3 differ
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Win 2000, XP, Vista, MCE2004/05, Win Server 2000/2003/2008 Mac OS X 10.3.9 +	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	430 x 443 x 420 mm	483 x 650 x 88 mm
Link/Act LEDKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Networking featuresDiffers	Ethernet, Fast Ethernet, Gigabit Ethernet	Gigabit Ethernet
Power requirementsDiffers	AC 100-240V, 50/60Hz	AC 100 - 120V/200 - 240V @ 50/60Hz
Non-operating relative humidity (non-condensing)Known for one	20 - 80%	Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	UL60950-1, CSA60950-1, EN60950-1, IEC60950-1, GOST, FCC Part-15 Class A, ICES-003 Class A, EN55022 Class A, VCCI Class A, AS/NZS CISPR22 Class A, CNS13438(C6357) Class A, C-Tick, BSMI, EN 55024, CE, RoHS, WEEE
Cache internalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1024 MB
Processoridentical
Processor frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.8 GHz
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	782 W

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More nas & storage servers comparisons

All nas & storage servers comparisons