Product comparison · 2 nas & storage servers

Buffalo CloudStor CS-X 1TB vs Fujitsu 60 S2

9specifications compared
8differ
1identical
25known for one product only

Key differences

Total installed storage capacity
- CloudStor CS-X 1TB:1 TB
- 60 S2:0.6 TB
Number of storage drives installed
- CloudStor CS-X 1TB:1
- 60 S2:2
Number of storage drives supported
- CloudStor CS-X 1TB:1
- 60 S2:24
Storage drive capacity
- CloudStor CS-X 1TB:1 TB
- 60 S2:300 GB
Storage drive interface
- CloudStor CS-X 1TB:Serial ATA, Serial ATA II
- 60 S2:Serial Attached SCSI (SAS)
Power consumption (typical)
- CloudStor CS-X 1TB:17 W
- 60 S2:430 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CloudStor CS-X 1TB, 60 S2
34 specifications	A Buffalo CloudStor CS-X 1TB View product	B Fujitsu 60 S2 View product
Storage5 differ
Total installed storage capacityDiffers	1 TB	0.6 TB
Number of storage drives installedDiffers	1	2
Number of storage drives supportedDiffers	1	24
Storage drive capacityDiffers	1 TB	300 GB
Storage drive interfaceDiffers	Serial ATA, Serial ATA II	Serial Attached SCSI (SAS)
Storage drive size	3.5"	3.5"
HDD speedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	15000 RPM
Maximum supported storage capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	72 TB
RAID levelsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0, 1, 1+0, 5, 5+0, 6
Network1 differ
Wi-FiKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Compliance industry standardsKnown for one	IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3ab	Unknown — not stated by the source
Maximum data transfer rateKnown for one	1000 Mbit/s	Unknown — not stated by the source
Supported network protocolsDiffers	TCP/IP, HTTP, HTTPS, NTP, AFP, SMB/CIFS	SNMP (v.1, 2C, 3), SMI-S 1.4
Ports & interfacesidentical
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB 2.0 ports quantityKnown for one	0	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for one	Black	Unknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	17 W	430 W
Weight & dimensionsidentical
WeightKnown for one	1.1 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
External power adapterKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other features1 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffers	Windows XP/Vista/7 Mac OS 10.39+	- Microsoft Windows Server2008 Standard (32-bit) (64-bit) including R2, - Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Enterprise (32-bit) (64-bit) including R2, - Microsoft Windows Server 2008 Datacenter (32-bit) (64-bit) including R2, - Microsoft Windows 7 Home Premium, - Microsoft Windows 7 Professional, - Micr
Dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	150 x 45 x 175 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Link/Act LEDKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Networking featuresKnown for one	Gigabit Ethernet	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power requirementsKnown for one	100-240 V, 50/60Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Compliance certificatesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	RoHS
Data transfer rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4 Gbit/s
Fibre ChannelKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Management platformKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CLI, ETERNUS SF Express
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	EN55024, WEEE, CNS13438(C6357) A, FCC CFR47 (15) A, ICES-003 A, EN55022 A, VCCI A, AS/NZS CISPR22 A, UL60950-1, CSA-C22.2 No. 60950-1, EN60950-1, IEC60950-1, GOST-R
Memoryidentical
Internal memoryKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1 GB
Performanceidentical
Noise levelKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	43.5 dB
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 40 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20 - 80%

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More nas & storage servers comparisons

All nas & storage servers comparisons