Product comparison · 2 nas & storage servers

Buffalo 500GB LinkStation Live™ vs Iomega StorCenter Pro 450r Series

Add a product
  • 11specifications compared
  • 7differ
  • 4identical
  • 15known for one product only

Key differences

The Iomega StorCenter Pro 450r Series has 1.5 TB more total installed storage capacity than the Buffalo 500GB LinkStation Live™ (2 TB vs 0.5 TB). The Iomega StorCenter Pro 450r Series has 3 more storage drives installed than the Buffalo 500GB LinkStation Live™ (4 vs 1). The Iomega StorCenter Pro 450r Series has 9.46 kg more weight than the Buffalo 500GB LinkStation Live™ (11.3 kg vs 1.84 kg). Storage drive interface: Serial ATA on the Buffalo 500GB LinkStation Live™, Serial ATA II on the Iomega StorCenter Pro 450r Series. Dimensions (WxDxH): 61 x 188 x 176 mm on the Buffalo 500GB LinkStation Live™, 440 x 540 x 41 mm on the Iomega StorCenter Pro 450r Series.

  • Total installed storage capacity
    • 500GB LinkStation Live™:0.5 TB
    • StorCenter Pro 450r Series:2 TB
  • Number of storage drives installed
    • 500GB LinkStation Live™:1
    • StorCenter Pro 450r Series:4
  • Storage drive interface
    • 500GB LinkStation Live™:Serial ATA
    • StorCenter Pro 450r Series:Serial ATA II
  • Weight
    • 500GB LinkStation Live™:1.84 kg
    • StorCenter Pro 450r Series:11.3 kg
  • Dimensions (WxDxH)
    • 500GB LinkStation Live™:61 x 188 x 176 mm
    • StorCenter Pro 450r Series:440 x 540 x 41 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 500GB LinkStation Live™, StorCenter Pro 450r Series
26 specifications
Storage3 differ
Total installed storage capacityDiffers0.5 TB2 TB
Number of storage drives installedDiffers14
Storage drive interfaceDiffersSerial ATASerial ATA II
RAID levelsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0, 1, 5, 10
Network1 differ
Compliance industry standardsKnown for oneIEEE802.3ab / IEEE802.3 / IEEE802.3u Standard (1000 BASE-T / 100 BASE-TX / 10 BASE-T)Unknown — not stated by the source
Data link protocolsKnown for oneTCP/IPUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum data transfer rateKnown for one1000 Mbit/sUnknown — not stated by the source
Supported network protocolsDiffersSMB, FTP, DLNATCP/IP, AppleTalk, IPX, CIFS/SMB, NFS, AFP, HTTP 1.1, FTP, WEBDAV
Performanceidentical
Management protocolsKnown for oneHTTPUnknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for one21 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers1.84 kg11.3 kg
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for one5 - 35 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Other features2 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffersWindowsVista, WindowsXP, Windows2000, WindowsMe, WindowsNT 4.0, Windows98SE-Microsoft Windows 2000 / XP Home / XP Professional / XP Professional x64 / Vista -MacX OS X 10.2.7
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs61 x 188 x 176 mm440 x 540 x 41 mm
Networking featuresKnown for one10 / 100 / 1000 MbpsUnknown — not stated by the source
Power requirementsKnown for oneAC100-230V 50/60 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUL, C-UL, CE, ICES, FCC Class A.
I/O portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2 x PS/2 1 x VGA 1 x COM
Processoridentical
Processor familyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceIntel® Xeon®
Processor frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1.86 GHz
Memoryidentical
Internal memoryKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 GB
Designidentical
Chassis typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceRack (1U)

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More nas & storage servers comparisons

All nas & storage servers comparisons