Product comparison · 2 multifunction printers

Epson Stylus DX7000F Dye-sublimation A4 vs Epson Stylus Photo RX700 Inkjet

Add a product
  • 22specifications compared
  • 11differ
  • 11identical
  • 21known for one product only

Key differences

  • Print technology
    • Stylus DX7000F Dye-sublimation A4:Dye-sublimation
    • Stylus Photo RX700 Inkjet:Inkjet
  • Print speed (black, normal quality, A4/US Letter)
    • Stylus DX7000F Dye-sublimation A4:27 ppm
    • Stylus Photo RX700 Inkjet:20 ppm
  • Print speed (colour, normal quality, A4/US Letter)
    • Stylus DX7000F Dye-sublimation A4:27 ppm
    • Stylus Photo RX700 Inkjet:19 ppm
  • Copy speed (black, normal quality, A4)
    • Stylus DX7000F Dye-sublimation A4:27 cpm
    • Stylus Photo RX700 Inkjet:15 cpm
  • Sound pressure level (printing)
    • Stylus DX7000F Dye-sublimation A4:45 dB
    • Stylus Photo RX700 Inkjet:46 dB
  • Display diagonal
    • Stylus DX7000F Dye-sublimation A4:5.08 cm (2")
    • Stylus Photo RX700 Inkjet:6.35 cm (2.5")
  • Power consumption (average operating)
    • Stylus DX7000F Dye-sublimation A4:16 W
    • Stylus Photo RX700 Inkjet:25 W
  • Weight
    • Stylus DX7000F Dye-sublimation A4:7.1 kg
    • Stylus Photo RX700 Inkjet:12.9 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of DX7000F, RX700
43 specifications
Printing3 differ
Print technologyDiffersDye-sublimationInkjet
Print speed (black, normal quality, A4/US Letter)Differs27 ppm20 ppm
Print speed (colour, normal quality, A4/US Letter)Differs27 ppm19 ppm
Economical printingKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Copying1 differ
Copy speed (black, normal quality, A4)Differs27 cpm15 cpm
Copy speed (colour, normal quality, A4)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source14 cpm
Scanningidentical
Maximum scan areaKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source216 x 297 mm
Input colour depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source48 bit
Scan input modesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceFlatbed, alternative 6 lines colour Matrix CCD with On-Chip Microlens
Input & output capacityidentical
Maximum input capacityKnown for one100 sheetsUnknown — not stated by the source
Maximum output capacityKnown for one100 sheetsUnknown — not stated by the source
Paper handlingidentical
Maximum ISO A-series paper sizeKnown for oneA4Unknown — not stated by the source
ISO A-series sizes (A0...A9)Known for oneA4, A5, A6Unknown — not stated by the source
ISO B-series sizes (B0...B9)Known for oneB5Unknown — not stated by the source
Non-ISO print media sizesKnown for oneLegalUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Direct printingKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Standard interfacesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUSB 2.0
USB portKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Performance1 differ
Sound pressure level (printing)Differs45 dB46 dB
Internal memoryKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source32 MB
Compatible memory cardsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMicrodrive
Design1 differ
Display diagonalDiffers5.08 cm (2")6.35 cm (2.5")
Power1 differ
Power consumption (average operating)Differs16 W25 W
Weight & dimensions1 differ
WeightDiffers7.1 kg12.9 kg
Other features3 differ
Dimensions (WxDxH)Differs463 x 344 x 178 mm450 x 418 x 236 mm
All-in-one functionsDiffersFax, ScanCopy, Fax, Scan
Compatible operating systemsDiffersWindows 98SE/ME/2000/XP/XP x64 Mac OS 10.2.8 +-Windows 98SE, ME, XP -Mac OS 9 +
PictBridgeKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Power supplyKnown for one16 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Print quality (black, draft quality)Known for one1200 DPIUnknown — not stated by the source
Print quality (colour, best quality)Known for one1200 DPIUnknown — not stated by the source
Scan speedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4 sec/page

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More multifunction printer comparisons

All multifunction printer comparisons