Product comparison · 2 multifunction printers

Epson AcuLaser CX37DN vs Epson AcuLaser CX37DNF

90specifications compared
13differ
77identical
21known for one product only

Key differences

Scanner type
- AcuLaser CX37DN:Flatbed & ADF scanner
- AcuLaser CX37DNF:Flatbed scanner
Image formats supported
- AcuLaser CX37DN:JPG, TIFF
- AcuLaser CX37DNF:JPG, TIF
Faxing
- AcuLaser CX37DN:No
- AcuLaser CX37DNF:Mono faxing
Auto document feeder (ADF) input capacity
- AcuLaser CX37DN:35 sheets
- AcuLaser CX37DNF:100 sheets
Standard interfaces
- AcuLaser CX37DN:USB 2.0
- AcuLaser CX37DNF:Ethernet, USB 2.0
USB 2.0 ports quantity
- AcuLaser CX37DN:2
- AcuLaser CX37DNF:1
Sound pressure level (printing)
- AcuLaser CX37DN:52.5 dB
- AcuLaser CX37DNF:53.5 dB
Product colour
- AcuLaser CX37DN:Grey
- AcuLaser CX37DNF:White

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of CX37DN, CX37DNF
111 specifications	A Epson AcuLaser CX37DN Model CX37DN View product	B Epson AcuLaser CX37DNF Model CX37DNF View product
Scanning2 differ
Scanner typeDiffers	Flatbed & ADF scanner	Flatbed scanner
Image formats supportedDiffers	JPG, TIFF	JPG, TIF
Document formats supportedKnown for one	PDF	Unknown — not stated by the source
Fax1 differ
FaxingDiffers	No	Mono faxing
Fax transmission speedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3 sec/page
Modem speedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	33.6 Kbit/s
Fax memoryKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	6 MB
Auto-redialingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Fax speed dialing (max numbers)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	220
Features1 differ
Page description languagesDiffers	PCL 5c, PCL 6, PDF 1.3, PDF 1.7	PCL 5c, PCL 6, PDF 1.7, PostScript 3
Input & output capacity1 differ
Auto document feeder (ADF) input capacityDiffers	35 sheets	100 sheets
Maximum number of input traysKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	3
Maximum output capacityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	150 sheets
Paper input typeKnown for one	Paper tray	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces2 differ
Standard interfacesDiffers	USB 2.0	Ethernet, USB 2.0
USB 2.0 ports quantityDiffers	2	1
Performance1 differ
Sound pressure level (printing)Differs	52.5 dB	53.5 dB
Sound pressure level (copying)Known for one	53.5 dB	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffers	Grey	White
Power1 differ
Power consumption (average operating)Differs	1100 W	500 W
Power consumption (PowerSave)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	34 W
Power consumption (printing)Known for one	560 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (sleep)Known for one	34 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
System requirementsidentical
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for one	Mac OS X 10.3 Panther, Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger, Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard, Mac OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard, Mac OS X 10.7 Lion, Mac OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion, Mac OS X 10.9 Mavericks	Unknown — not stated by the source
Linux operating systems supportedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Server operating systems supportedKnown for one	Windows Server 2003, Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2012, Windows Server 2016	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions2 differ
WidthDiffers	446 mm	446.5 mm
WeightDiffers	32.5 kg	27.7 kg
Packaging data1 differ
Package weightDiffers	38.5 kg	37.5 kg
Logistics dataidentical
Harmonized System (HS) codeKnown for one	84433100	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Networking featuresKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Gigabit Ethernet
Network readyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Networking standardsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	IEEE 802.3, IEEE 802.3ab, IEEE 802.3u, IEEE 802.3x
Power supply typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	AC

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More multifunction printer comparisons

All multifunction printer comparisons