All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 monitors

Viewsonic Value Series VA2226w computer monitor vs Viewsonic Professional Series VP950b computer monitor

Add a product
  • 43specifications compared
  • 23differ
  • 20identical
  • 8known for one product only

Key differences

  • Display diagonal
    • 55.9 cm (22")
    • 48.3 cm (19")
  • Display resolution
    • 1680 x 1050 pixels
    • 1280 x 1024 pixels
  • Display brightness (typical)
    • 300 cd/m²
    • 280 cd/m²
  • Response time
    • 5 ms
    • 2 ms
  • Contrast ratio (typical)
    • 1000:1
    • 800:1
  • Viewing angle, horizontal
    • 175°
    • 170°
  • Pixel pitch
    • 0.282 x 0.282 mm
    • 0.294 x 0.294 mm
  • Vertical scan range
    • 50 - 75 Hz
    • 50 - 85 Hz

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
51 specifications
A

Viewsonic

Value Series VA2226w computer monitor

Model VA2226w

View product
B

Viewsonic

Professional Series VP950b computer monitor

Model VP950b

View product
Display9 differ
Display diagonalDiffers55.9 cm (22")48.3 cm (19")
Display resolutionDiffers1680 x 1050 pixels1280 x 1024 pixels
TouchscreenNoNo
Display brightness (typical)Differs300 cd/m²280 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers5 ms2 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs1000:1800:1
Contrast ratio (dynamic)2000:12000:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers175°170°
Viewing angle, vertical170°170°
Pixel pitchDiffers0.282 x 0.282 mm0.294 x 0.294 mm
Horizontal scan range24 - 82 kHz24 - 82 kHz
Vertical scan rangeDiffers50 - 75 Hz50 - 85 Hz
Viewable size diagonalDiffers55.9 cm48.3 cm
Sync-on-green (SOG)YesYes
Separate H/V syncYesYes
Composite syncYesYes
Designidentical
Market positioningKnown for oneBusiness
Product colourBlackBlack
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB hub versionKnown for one2.0
USB Type-A downstream ports quantityKnown for one5
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantity11
DVI-D ports quantity11
HDCPYesYes
AC (power) inYesYes
Ergonomicsidentical
Panel mounting interface100 x 100 mm100 x 100 mm
Cable lock slotYesYes
Cable lock slot typeKensingtonKensington
Adjustable height (max)Known for one0 mm
Swivel angle rangeKnown for one120
Tilt angle range5 - 20°5 - 20°
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs38 W40 W
Power consumption (PowerSave)1 W1 W
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating temperature (T-T)0 - 40 °C0 - 40 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs20 - 90%10 - 90%
Weight & dimensions7 differ
Width (with stand)Differs510 mm412 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs225 mm279 mm
Height (with stand)Differs432 mm510 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs5.1 kg5.6 kg
Width (without stand)Differs510 mm412 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs61 mm63 mm
Height (without stand)Differs351 mm331 mm
Weight (without stand)Known for one4.4 kg
Packaging data2 differ
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Differs560 x 124 x 474 mm470 x 195 x 523 mm
Package weightDiffers6.6 kg7.5 kg
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesENERGY STARENERGY STAR
Other features3 differ
Display viewable area (HxV)Differs474 x 296 mm376 x 301 mm
Power requirementsDiffersAC 100 - 240 V, 50/60 HzAC 100 - 240 V, 50 - 60 Hz
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one50000 h
CertificationDiffersTCO’03, TÜV/GS, TÜV/ERGO, ISO 13406-2, CE, CB, GOST-R, UL, cUL, FCC-B (ICES), ICES-003B, NOM, SASO, C-Tick, KTL/MIC, BSMI, PSB, MPR II, TÜV-S, CCC, VCCI, WEEE, RoHSTCO’03, CE, CB, TÜV/GS, TÜV/ERGO, ISO 13406-2, UL, cUL, GOST-R, Hygienic, FCC-B (ICES), ICES-003B, NOM, SASO, C-Tick, KTL/MIC, BSMI, PSB, TÜV-S, MPR II, CCC, Green Mark, EPEAT, WEEE, RoHS
Supplied AC adapter typeLCDLCD
BandwidthKnown for one0.135 GHz

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons