Product comparison · 2 monitors

TCL 25P2A Pro vs TCL G64 32G64 computer monitor

96specifications compared
35differ
61identical
11known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- 25P2A Pro:63.5 cm (25")
- G64 32G64 computer monitor:81.3 cm (32")
Display technology
- 25P2A Pro:LED
- G64 32G64 computer monitor:QLED
Panel type
- 25P2A Pro:IPS
- G64 32G64 computer monitor:Fast VA
Display brightness (typical)
- 25P2A Pro:800 cd/m²
- G64 32G64 computer monitor:600 cd/m²
Contrast ratio (typical)
- 25P2A Pro:1300:1
- G64 32G64 computer monitor:3500:1
Contrast ratio (dynamic)
- 25P2A Pro:1000000:1
- G64 32G64 computer monitor:6000000:1
Maximum refresh rate
- 25P2A Pro:360 Hz
- G64 32G64 computer monitor:180 Hz
Display diagonal (metric)
- 25P2A Pro:64 cm
- G64 32G64 computer monitor:81 cm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 25P2A Pro, 32G64
107 specifications	A TCL 25P2A Pro View product	B TCL G64 32G64 computer monitor Model 32G64 View product
Display11 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	63.5 cm (25")	81.3 cm (32")
Display technologyDiffers	LED	QLED
Panel typeDiffers	IPS	Fast VA
Display brightness (typical)Differs	800 cd/m²	600 cd/m²
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs	1300:1	3500:1
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Differs	1000000:1	6000000:1
Maximum refresh rateDiffers	360 Hz	180 Hz
Display diagonal (metric)Differs	64 cm	81 cm
High Dynamic Range (HDR) technologyDiffers	DisplayHDR 600	High Dynamic Range (HDR) 600
Colour gamut standardDiffers	Adobe RGB, DCI-P3, sRGB	DCI-P3, sRGB
DCI-P3 coverageDiffers	95%	96%
Colour gamutKnown for one	95%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
NVIDIA G-SYNC typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	G-SYNC Compatible
VESA Adaptive Sync supportKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
Built-in USB hubKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomics1 differ
Tilt angle rangeDiffers	-5 - 15°	5 - 23°
Power1 differ
Energy efficiency class (SDR)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	F
Energy efficiency class (HDR)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	G
Energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hoursKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	32 kWh
Energy consumption (HDR) per 1000 hoursKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	56 kWh
Power consumption (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	120 W
Power consumption (off)Differs	0 W	0.3 W
Weight & dimensions8 differ
Width (with stand)Differs	556 mm	713.8 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs	226 mm	250 mm
Height (with stand)Differs	501 mm	596 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs	5.3 kg	8.69 kg
Width (without stand)Differs	556 mm	713.8 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	76 mm	78 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	325 mm	421 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	3.4 kg	5.3 kg
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers	762 mm	952 mm
Package depthDiffers	163 mm	223 mm
Package heightDiffers	430 mm	560 mm
Package weightDiffers	7.3 kg	12.2 kg
Packaging content1 differ
Quick start guideDiffers	No	Yes
Logistics data9 differ
Master (outer) case widthDiffers	762 mm	952 mm
Master (outer) case lengthDiffers	163 mm	223 mm
Master (outer) case heightDiffers	501 mm	560 mm
Master (outer) case net weightDiffers	7.3 kg	12.2 kg
Master (outer) case gross weightDiffers	7.3 kg	12.2 kg
Products per palletDiffers	28 pc(s)	12 pc(s)
Pallet net heightDiffers	187 cm	193.5 cm
Pallet net weightDiffers	219.4 kg	159 kg
Pallet gross weightDiffers	219.4 kg	159 kg
Master (outer) case volumeKnown for one	1 cm³	Unknown — not stated by the source
Multimediaidentical
Built-in speaker(s)Known for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons