Product comparison · 2 monitors

Samsung SyncMaster 960BG, Black vs Viewsonic A Series VA702 computer monitor

Add a product
  • 22specifications compared
  • 12differ
  • 10identical
  • 19known for one product only

Key differences

  • Display diagonal
    • SyncMaster 960BG, Black:48.3 cm (19")
    • A Series VA702 computer monitor:43.2 cm (17")
  • Response time
    • SyncMaster 960BG, Black:4 ms
    • A Series VA702 computer monitor:8 ms
  • Contrast ratio (typical)
    • SyncMaster 960BG, Black:700:1
    • A Series VA702 computer monitor:500:1
  • Horizontal scan range
    • SyncMaster 960BG, Black:30 - 81 kHz
    • A Series VA702 computer monitor:30 - 82 kHz
  • Vertical scan range
    • SyncMaster 960BG, Black:56 - 75 Hz
    • A Series VA702 computer monitor:50 - 85 Hz
  • Product colour
    • SyncMaster 960BG, Black:Black
    • A Series VA702 computer monitor:Silver
  • DVI-I ports quantity
    • SyncMaster 960BG, Black:1
    • A Series VA702 computer monitor:0
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • SyncMaster 960BG, Black:38 W
    • A Series VA702 computer monitor:35 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of SyncMaster 960BG, Black, VA702
41 specifications
Display5 differ
Display diagonalDiffers48.3 cm (19")43.2 cm (17")
Display resolution1280 x 1024 pixels1280 x 1024 pixels
TouchscreenNoNo
Display brightness (typical)300 cd/m²300 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers4 ms8 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs700:1500:1
Viewing angle, horizontal160°160°
Viewing angle, vertical160°160°
Display number of coloursKnown for one16.78 million coloursUnknown — not stated by the source
Pixel pitchKnown for one0.294Unknown — not stated by the source
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers30 - 81 kHz30 - 82 kHz
Vertical scan rangeDiffers56 - 75 Hz50 - 85 Hz
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffersBlackSilver
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB Type-A downstream ports quantity00
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantity11
DVI-D ports quantity00
DVI-I ports quantityDiffers10
Audio inputNoNo
Audio outputNoNo
Microphone inKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Ergonomicsidentical
PivotKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Plug and PlayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs38 W35 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one1 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Width (with stand)Known for one420.2 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Depth (with stand)Known for one258.8 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Height (with stand)Known for one420.5 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Width (without stand)Differs420.2 mm378 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs35.8 mm196 mm
Height (without stand)Differs348 mm374 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs5.6 kg4.5 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one492 x 137 x 547 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one7.7 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Other featuresidentical
Special featuresKnown for one- Magic Clear - MagicTune - MagicBright - MagicColor - MagicZone - Magic RotationUnknown — not stated by the source
Supplied AC adapter typeKnown for oneLCDUnknown — not stated by the source
TV tuner integratedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Power requirementsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAC 100-240V, 50/60Hz
Compliance industry standardsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceTCO'03, ENERGY STAR
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceUL, cUL, FCC-B, CB report, CE, NOM, TUV/G5, TUV/GS, (covers ISO13406-2), TCO'03, GOST-R, PCBC, TUV-S EMI/B, VCCI, SASO, BSMI, CCC, ENERGY STAR?, PSB, C-TICK, ENERGY, IRAM, ICES-B, RoHS
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 - 40 °C
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 - 90%

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons