Product comparison · 2 monitors

Samsung SyncMaster 245B vs Samsung SyncMaster 920XT

Add a product
  • 22specifications compared
  • 16differ
  • 6identical
  • 23known for one product only

Key differences

  • Display diagonal
    • SyncMaster 245B:61 cm (24")
    • SyncMaster 920XT:48.3 cm (19")
  • Display resolution
    • SyncMaster 245B:1920 x 1200 pixels
    • SyncMaster 920XT:1280 x 1024 pixels
  • Display brightness (typical)
    • SyncMaster 245B:400 cd/m²
    • SyncMaster 920XT:300 cd/m²
  • Response time
    • SyncMaster 245B:5 ms
    • SyncMaster 920XT:8 ms
  • Contrast ratio (typical)
    • SyncMaster 245B:1000:1
    • SyncMaster 920XT:600:1
  • Pixel pitch
    • SyncMaster 245B:0.270 x 0.270 mm
    • SyncMaster 920XT:0.264
  • Panel mounting interface
    • SyncMaster 245B:200 x 100 mm
    • SyncMaster 920XT:100 x 100 mm
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • SyncMaster 245B:100 W
    • SyncMaster 920XT:70 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of SyncMaster 245B, SyncMaster 920XT
45 specifications
Display6 differ
Display diagonalDiffers61 cm (24")48.3 cm (19")
Display resolutionDiffers1920 x 1200 pixels1280 x 1024 pixels
TouchscreenNoNo
Display brightness (typical)Differs400 cd/m²300 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers5 ms8 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs1000:1600:1
Viewing angle, horizontal160°160°
Viewing angle, vertical160°160°
Display number of coloursKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source16.78 million colours
Pixel pitchDiffers0.270 x 0.270 mm0.264
Sync-on-green (SOG)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Separate H/V syncKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Composite syncKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for one30 - 81 kHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Vertical scan rangeKnown for one56 - 75 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size diagonalKnown for one61 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB hub versionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.0
USB Type-A downstream ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source4
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantity11
DVI-D ports quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomics1 differ
Panel mounting interfaceDiffers200 x 100 mm100 x 100 mm
Adjustable height (max)Known for one10 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Swivel angle rangeKnown for one45 - 45°Unknown — not stated by the source
Plug and PlayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs100 W70 W
Power consumption (standby)Differs2 W1 W
Weight & dimensions7 differ
Width (with stand)Differs560 mm370 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs250 mm200 mm
Height (with stand)Differs444.5 mm404 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs8.4 kg6.4 kg
Width (without stand)Differs560 mm370 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs83 mm69 mm
Height (without stand)Differs386.5 mm342.3 mm
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesENERGY STARENERGY STAR
Other featuresidentical
Ethernet LAN (RJ-45) portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
Special featuresKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMagicSpeed MagicColor MagicTune MagicBright MagicZone MagicRotation
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceTCO'99
Supplied AC adapter typeLCDLCD
Thin Clientidentical
Processor modelKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNX 1500
Processor frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1 GHz
Internal memoryKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source256 MB
Flash memoryKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1024 MB
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for oneBlackUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one733 x 350 x 557 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one10.6 kgUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons