Product comparison · 2 monitors

Samsung SM723N computer monitor vs Samsung SyncMaster 2253LW

Add a product
  • 25specifications compared
  • 15differ
  • 10identical
  • 26known for one product only

Key differences

  • Display diagonal
    • SM723N computer monitor:43.2 cm (17")
    • SyncMaster 2253LW:55.9 cm (22")
  • Display resolution
    • SM723N computer monitor:1280 x 1024 pixels
    • SyncMaster 2253LW:1680 x 1050 pixels
  • Response time
    • SM723N computer monitor:5 ms
    • SyncMaster 2253LW:2 ms
  • Contrast ratio (typical)
    • SM723N computer monitor:800:1
    • SyncMaster 2253LW:1000:1
  • Panel mounting interface
    • SM723N computer monitor:75 x 75 mm
    • SyncMaster 2253LW:100 x 100 mm
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • SM723N computer monitor:31 W
    • SyncMaster 2253LW:45 W
  • Width (with stand)
    • SM723N computer monitor:371.9 mm
    • SyncMaster 2253LW:513.7 mm
  • Depth (with stand)
    • SM723N computer monitor:199.9 mm
    • SyncMaster 2253LW:219 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of SM723N, SyncMaster 2253LW
51 specifications
Display4 differ
Display diagonalDiffers43.2 cm (17")55.9 cm (22")
Display resolutionDiffers1280 x 1024 pixels1680 x 1050 pixels
Response timeDiffers5 ms2 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs800:11000:1
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source8000:1
Pixel pitchKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.258 x 0.258 mm
Digital horizontal frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 - 81 kHz
Digital vertical frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source50 - 85 Hz
Sync-on-green (SOG)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Colour gamut standardKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcesRGB
Separate H/V syncKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Composite syncKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Display panel sizeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source548.6 mm
Native aspect ratioKnown for one4:3Unknown — not stated by the source
Aspect ratioKnown for one4:3Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBlack
Ports & interfacesidentical
DVI-D ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
HDCPKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
USB Type-A downstream ports quantityKnown for one0Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomics1 differ
Panel mounting interfaceDiffers75 x 75 mm100 x 100 mm
LED indicatorsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceStand-by
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs31 W45 W
Weight & dimensions7 differ
Width (with stand)Differs371.9 mm513.7 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs199.9 mm219 mm
Height (with stand)Differs385.5 mm400.3 mm
Width (without stand)Differs371.9 mm513.7 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs64.7 mm61.2 mm
Height (without stand)Differs308.7 mm352.2 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs3.5 kg5.4 kg
Packaging data1 differ
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source593 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source132 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source433 mm
Package weightDiffers4.6 kg6.8 kg
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one466 x 122 x 434.3 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Quick start guideKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
ManualKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceENERGY STAR
Other features1 differ
Compliance industry standardsDiffersTCO '03DDC 2B
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceISO, CE
Supplied AC adapter typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLCD

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons