Product comparison · 2 monitors

Samsung SM710V 17" TFT .297 61kHz TCO99 Silver vs Viewsonic 15IN TFT 1024X768 62KHZ

Add a product
  • 17specifications compared
  • 15differ
  • 2identical
  • 9known for one product only

Key differences

The Samsung SM710V 17" TFT .297 61kHz TCO99 Silver has 40 cd/m² more display brightness (typical) than the Viewsonic 15IN TFT 1024X768 62KHZ (290 cd/m² vs 250 cd/m²). The Viewsonic 15IN TFT 1024X768 62KHZ has 5 ms more response time than the Samsung SM710V 17" TFT .297 61kHz TCO99 Silver (30 ms vs 25 ms). The Samsung SM710V 17" TFT .297 61kHz TCO99 Silver has 100 :1 more contrast ratio (typical) than the Viewsonic 15IN TFT 1024X768 62KHZ (500:1 vs 400:1). Display diagonal: 43.2 cm (17") on the Samsung SM710V 17" TFT .297 61kHz TCO99 Silver, 38.1 cm (15") on the Viewsonic 15IN TFT 1024X768 62KHZ. Display resolution: 1280 x 1024 pixels on the Samsung SM710V 17" TFT .297 61kHz TCO99 Silver, 1024 x 768 pixels on the Viewsonic 15IN TFT 1024X768 62KHZ.

  • Display diagonal
    • SM710V 17" TFT .297 61kHz TCO99 Silver:43.2 cm (17")
    • 15IN TFT 1024X768 62KHZ:38.1 cm (15")
  • Display resolution
    • SM710V 17" TFT .297 61kHz TCO99 Silver:1280 x 1024 pixels
    • 15IN TFT 1024X768 62KHZ:1024 x 768 pixels
  • Display brightness (typical)
    • SM710V 17" TFT .297 61kHz TCO99 Silver:290 cd/m²
    • 15IN TFT 1024X768 62KHZ:250 cd/m²
  • Response time
    • SM710V 17" TFT .297 61kHz TCO99 Silver:25 ms
    • 15IN TFT 1024X768 62KHZ:30 ms
  • Contrast ratio (typical)
    • SM710V 17" TFT .297 61kHz TCO99 Silver:500:1
    • 15IN TFT 1024X768 62KHZ:400:1
  • Viewing angle, horizontal
    • SM710V 17" TFT .297 61kHz TCO99 Silver:150°
    • 15IN TFT 1024X768 62KHZ:120°
  • Viewing angle, vertical
    • SM710V 17" TFT .297 61kHz TCO99 Silver:120°
    • 15IN TFT 1024X768 62KHZ:110°
  • Horizontal scan range
    • SM710V 17" TFT .297 61kHz TCO99 Silver:30 - 81 kHz
    • 15IN TFT 1024X768 62KHZ:30 - 62 kHz

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of SM710V 17" TFT .297 61kHz TCO99 Silver, 15IN TFT 1024X768 62KHZ
26 specifications
Display9 differ
Display diagonalDiffers43.2 cm (17")38.1 cm (15")
Display resolutionDiffers1280 x 1024 pixels1024 x 768 pixels
Display brightness (typical)Differs290 cd/m²250 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers25 ms30 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs500:1400:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers150°120°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers120°110°
Display number of coloursKnown for one16.78 million coloursUnknown — not stated by the source
Pixel pitchKnown for one0.264Unknown — not stated by the source
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers30 - 81 kHz30 - 62 kHz
Vertical scan rangeDiffers56 - 75 Hz50 - 75 Hz
Ports & interfacesidentical
I/O portsKnown for one15 pin D-SubUnknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one100 x 100 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Plug and PlayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs34 W30 W
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Width (without stand)Differs382 mm356 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs175 mm344 mm
Height (without stand)Differs383 mm200 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs4.6 kg3.7 kg
Other features1 differ
CertificationDiffersTCO99UL, cUL, FCC-B, CB, CE, IC-B, EPA, NOM, TUV/GS, VCCI, BSMI, PSB (S-MARK), EMI/B, MPR-II, NEMKO, SEMKO, DEMKO, FIMKO, TCO'99(VE155), TCO'95(VE155b), ISO13046-2, ENERGY.
CompatibilityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePC PC compatible (from VGA up to 1024x768 non-interlaced) /Mac-Power Mac G3/G4 up to 1024x768 (*Adapter may be required. Analog adapter available from ViewSonic.) /
Power managementKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMeets TCO '99 and ENERGY standards
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10 - 90%
Maximum operating temperature range (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 - 40 °C

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons