Product comparison · 2 monitors

Samsung monitor 172N 17"LCD Zilver vs Samsung SM173B 17" TFT .264 81kHz TCO99 Silver

20specifications compared
4differ
16identical
2known for one product only

Key differences

The Samsung SM173B 17" TFT .264 81kHz TCO99 Silver has 5 W more power consumption (typical) than the Samsung monitor 172N 17"LCD Zilver (45 W vs 40 W). The Samsung SM173B 17" TFT .264 81kHz TCO99 Silver has 14 mm more width (without stand) than the Samsung monitor 172N 17"LCD Zilver (382 mm vs 368 mm). The Samsung SM173B 17" TFT .264 81kHz TCO99 Silver has 41 mm more height (without stand) than the Samsung monitor 172N 17"LCD Zilver (435 mm vs 394 mm).

Power consumption (typical)
- monitor 172N 17"LCD Zilver:40 W
- SM173B 17" TFT .264 81kHz TCO99 Silver:45 W
Width (without stand)
- monitor 172N 17"LCD Zilver:368 mm
- SM173B 17" TFT .264 81kHz TCO99 Silver:382 mm
Height (without stand)
- monitor 172N 17"LCD Zilver:394 mm
- SM173B 17" TFT .264 81kHz TCO99 Silver:435 mm
Package weight
- monitor 172N 17"LCD Zilver:6 kg
- SM173B 17" TFT .264 81kHz TCO99 Silver:6.5 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of monitor 172N 17"LCD Zilver, SM173B 17" TFT .264 81kHz TCO99 Silver
22 specifications	A Samsung monitor 172N 17"LCD Zilver View product	B Samsung SM173B 17" TFT .264 81kHz TCO99 Silver View product
Ergonomicsidentical
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one	100 x 100 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	40 W	45 W
Weight & dimensions2 differ
Width (without stand)Differs	368 mm	382 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	394 mm	435 mm
Packaging data1 differ
Package weightDiffers	6 kg	6.5 kg
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	432 x 167 x 427 mm

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons