Product comparison · 2 monitors

Samsung F2080 computer monitor vs Samsung PX2370 computer monitor

33specifications compared
20differ
13identical
23known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- F2080 computer monitor:50.8 cm (20")
- PX2370 computer monitor:58.4 cm (23")
Display resolution
- F2080 computer monitor:1600 x 900 pixels
- PX2370 computer monitor:1920 x 1080 pixels
Response time
- F2080 computer monitor:8 ms
- PX2370 computer monitor:2 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)
- F2080 computer monitor:3000:1
- PX2370 computer monitor:1000:1
Contrast ratio (dynamic)
- F2080 computer monitor:150000:1
- PX2370 computer monitor:5000000:1
Viewing angle, horizontal
- F2080 computer monitor:178°
- PX2370 computer monitor:170°
Viewing angle, vertical
- F2080 computer monitor:178°
- PX2370 computer monitor:160°
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantity
- F2080 computer monitor:1
- PX2370 computer monitor:0

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of F2080, PX2370
56 specifications	A Samsung F2080 computer monitor Model F2080 View product	B Samsung PX2370 computer monitor Model PX2370 View product
Display7 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	50.8 cm (20")	58.4 cm (23")
Display resolutionDiffers	1600 x 900 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels
HD typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Full HD
Response timeDiffers	8 ms	2 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs	3000:1	1000:1
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Differs	150000:1	5000000:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	178°	170°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	178°	160°
Colour gamut standardKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	sRGB
Native aspect ratioKnown for one	16:9	Unknown — not stated by the source
Aspect ratioKnown for one	16:9	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Operating system installedKnown for one	Windows Vista Home Premium	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces3 differ
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityDiffers	1	0
DVI-D ports quantityDiffers	2	0
DVI-I ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
HDMI ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Audio outputKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
HDCPDiffers	Yes	No
Digital audio optical outKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Ergonomicsidentical
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Stand-by
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one	100 x 100,200 x 100 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Adjustable height (max)Known for one	13 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	40 W	25 W
Power consumption (standby)Differs	1 W	0.3 W
Weight & dimensions7 differ
Width (with stand)Differs	474.1 mm	557.5 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs	197 mm	233 mm
Height (with stand)Differs	357.6 mm	433.5 mm
Width (without stand)Differs	474.1 mm	557.5 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	61.6 mm	26.5 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	288.9 mm	337 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	5.5 kg	4.1 kg
Bezel width (side)Known for one	1.5 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging contentidentical
Quick start guideKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
ManualKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	ENERGY STAR
Other features1 differ
Power requirementsDiffers	SMPS internal	12 V
Signal inputKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	RGB/DVI/HDMI
Supplied AC adapter typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	AC
CertificationKnown for one	TCO5.0	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging dataidentical
Package widthKnown for one	550 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package depthKnown for one	177 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package heightKnown for one	366 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one	6.8 kg	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons