Product comparison · 2 monitors

Samsung 743B+ computer monitor vs Samsung SyncMaster P2270

22specifications compared
11differ
11identical
21known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- 743B+ computer monitor:43.2 cm (17")
- SyncMaster P2270:55.9 cm (22")
Display resolution
- 743B+ computer monitor:1280 x 1024 pixels
- SyncMaster P2270:1920 x 1080 pixels
Display brightness (typical)
- 743B+ computer monitor:300 cd/m²
- SyncMaster P2270:250 cd/m²
Response time
- 743B+ computer monitor:5 ms
- SyncMaster P2270:2 ms
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantity
- 743B+ computer monitor:1
- SyncMaster P2270:0
DVI-D ports quantity
- 743B+ computer monitor:1
- SyncMaster P2270:0
Power consumption (typical)
- 743B+ computer monitor:30 W
- SyncMaster P2270:28 W
Width (without stand)
- 743B+ computer monitor:368 mm
- SyncMaster P2270:548.6 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 743B+, SyncMaster P2270
43 specifications	A Samsung 743B+ computer monitor Model 743B+ View product	B Samsung SyncMaster P2270 View product
Display4 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	43.2 cm (17")	55.9 cm (22")
Display resolutionDiffers	1280 x 1024 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels
Native aspect ratioKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16:9
Touchscreen	No	No
HD typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Full HD
Display brightness (typical)Differs	300 cd/m²	250 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers	5 ms	2 ms
Aspect ratioKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	16:9
Contrast ratio (typical)	1000:1	1000:1
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50000:1
Viewing angle, horizontal	170°	170°
Viewing angle, vertical	160°	160°
Pixel pitchKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.248 x 0.248 mm
Digital horizontal frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	30 - 75 kHz
Digital vertical frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	56 - 61 Hz
Performanceidentical
Mac operating systems supported	Yes	Yes
Multimediaidentical
Built-in speaker(s)	No	No
Built-in camera	No	No
Designidentical
Product colour	Black	Black
Ports & interfaces2 differ
USB Type-A downstream ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityDiffers	1	0
DVI-D ports quantityDiffers	1	0
HDCPKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Ergonomicsidentical
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one	75 x 75 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Stand-by	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	30 W	28 W
Power consumption (standby)	1 W	1 W
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Width (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	548.6 mm
Depth (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	189.5 mm
Height (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	403 mm
Width (without stand)Differs	368 mm	548.6 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	190 mm	49.6 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	367.2 mm	345.2 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	4.75 kg	3.6 kg
Packaging dataidentical
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	659 x 116 x 418 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5.3 kg
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	ENERGY STAR
Other featuresidentical
TV tuner integrated	No	No
Signal inputKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	analog, digital
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	CE, ISO 13406/2
Supplied AC adapter type	LCD	LCD
Special featuresKnown for one	MagicBright3, Off timer, Colour Effect, Customised key, MagicWizard & MagicTune with AssetManagement, Windows Vista Premium, Magic Rotation S / W (Pivot) Safe Mode (DownScaling in UXGA)	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons