Product comparison · 2 monitors

Samsung 2220WM-HAS Wide lcd monitor vs Samsung 943T High definition monitor

Add a product
  • 31specifications compared
  • 21differ
  • 10identical
  • 10known for one product only

Key differences

The Samsung 2220WM-HAS Wide lcd monitor has 50 cd/m² more display brightness (typical) than the Samsung 943T High definition monitor (300 cd/m² vs 250 cd/m²). The Samsung 943T High definition monitor has 20 ms more response time than the Samsung 2220WM-HAS Wide lcd monitor (25 ms vs 5 ms). The Samsung 943T High definition monitor has 500 :1 more contrast ratio (typical) than the Samsung 2220WM-HAS Wide lcd monitor (1500:1 vs 1000:1). Only the Samsung 2220WM-HAS Wide lcd monitor has built-in speaker(s). Display diagonal: 55.9 cm (22") on the Samsung 2220WM-HAS Wide lcd monitor, 48.3 cm (19") on the Samsung 943T High definition monitor.

  • Display diagonal
    • 2220WM-HAS Wide lcd monitor:55.9 cm (22")
    • 943T High definition monitor:48.3 cm (19")
  • Display resolution
    • 2220WM-HAS Wide lcd monitor:1680 x 1050 pixels
    • 943T High definition monitor:1280 x 1024 pixels
  • Display brightness (typical)
    • 2220WM-HAS Wide lcd monitor:300 cd/m²
    • 943T High definition monitor:250 cd/m²
  • Response time
    • 2220WM-HAS Wide lcd monitor:5 ms
    • 943T High definition monitor:25 ms
  • Contrast ratio (typical)
    • 2220WM-HAS Wide lcd monitor:1000:1
    • 943T High definition monitor:1500:1
  • Viewing angle, horizontal
    • 2220WM-HAS Wide lcd monitor:170°
    • 943T High definition monitor:178°
  • Viewing angle, vertical
    • 2220WM-HAS Wide lcd monitor:160°
    • 943T High definition monitor:178°
  • Built-in speaker(s)
    • 2220WM-HAS Wide lcd monitor:Yes
    • 943T High definition monitor:No

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 2220WM-HAS Wide lcd monitor, 943T High definition monitor
41 specifications
Display7 differ
Display diagonalDiffers55.9 cm (22")48.3 cm (19")
Display resolutionDiffers1680 x 1050 pixels1280 x 1024 pixels
Display brightness (typical)Differs300 cd/m²250 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers5 ms25 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs1000:11500:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers170°178°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers160°178°
Multimedia1 differ
Built-in speaker(s)DiffersYesNo
RMS rated powerKnown for one2 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB hub versionKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2.0
USB Type-A downstream ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
HDCPKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
PivotKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Plug and PlayKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs46 W34 W
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Width (with stand)Differs517.1 mm380.2 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs416.5 mm189.9 mm
Height (with stand)Differs89.8 mm405.6 mm
Width (without stand)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source380.2 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs5 kg4.85 kg
Weight (with stand)Known for one5.08 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Packaging data5 differ
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Differs605 x 505.9 x 148 mm479 x 411.9 x 203.2 mm
Package widthDiffers605 mm479 mm
Package depthDiffers505.9 mm411.9 mm
Package heightDiffers148 mm203.2 mm
Package weightDiffers6.26 kg6.5 kg
Other features3 differ
USB ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0
Special featuresDiffersHDCP support/Magic Bright2MagicBright3/off timer/color effect/customized key/MagicWizard & MagicTune with AssetManagement/Windows Vista Premium/MagicRotation S/W (Pivot)/safe mode (DownScaling in UXGA)
Set depth (with stand) (inch)Differs41.7 cm (16.4")19 cm (7.48")
Set height (with stand) (inch)Differs8.69 cm (3.42")40.6 cm (16")
Supplied AC adapter typeKnown for oneACUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons