Product comparison · 2 monitors

Philips 32PF9986 computer monitor vs Samsung Syncmaster 193P

14specifications compared
11differ
3identical
11known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips 32PF9986 computer monitor has 200 cd/m² more display brightness (typical) than the Samsung Syncmaster 193P (450 cd/m² vs 250 cd/m²). The Samsung Syncmaster 193P has 8 ms more response time than the Philips 32PF9986 computer monitor (20 ms vs 12 ms). The Samsung Syncmaster 193P has 8° more viewing angle, horizontal than the Philips 32PF9986 computer monitor (178° vs 170°). Display diagonal: 81.3 cm (32") on the Philips 32PF9986 computer monitor, 48.3 cm (19") on the Samsung Syncmaster 193P. Display resolution: 1366 x 768 pixels on the Philips 32PF9986 computer monitor, 1280 x 1024 pixels on the Samsung Syncmaster 193P.

Display diagonal
- 32PF9986 computer monitor:81.3 cm (32")
- Syncmaster 193P:48.3 cm (19")
Display resolution
- 32PF9986 computer monitor:1366 x 768 pixels
- Syncmaster 193P:1280 x 1024 pixels
Display brightness (typical)
- 32PF9986 computer monitor:450 cd/m²
- Syncmaster 193P:250 cd/m²
Response time
- 32PF9986 computer monitor:12 ms
- Syncmaster 193P:20 ms
Viewing angle, horizontal
- 32PF9986 computer monitor:170°
- Syncmaster 193P:178°
Viewing angle, vertical
- 32PF9986 computer monitor:170°
- Syncmaster 193P:178°
Power consumption (typical)
- 32PF9986 computer monitor:145 W
- Syncmaster 193P:40 W
Width (without stand)
- 32PF9986 computer monitor:1000 mm
- Syncmaster 193P:423 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 32PF9986, Syncmaster 193P
25 specifications	A Philips 32PF9986 computer monitor Model 32PF9986 View product	B Samsung Syncmaster 193P View product
Display6 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	81.3 cm (32")	48.3 cm (19")
Display resolutionDiffers	1366 x 768 pixels	1280 x 1024 pixels
Display brightness (typical)Differs	450 cd/m²	250 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers	12 ms	20 ms
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	170°	178°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	170°	178°
Pixel pitchKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0.294
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	30 - 81 kHz
Vertical scan rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	56 - 75 Hz
Ergonomicsidentical
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	145 W	40 W
Power consumption (standby)Known for one	1.3 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Width (without stand)Differs	1000 mm	423 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	96 mm	236 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	605 mm	413 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	20 kg	7.1 kg
Other featuresidentical
Video inKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	VGA (15 pin D-sub), DVI-D
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	TCO'03
Audio systemKnown for one	Virtual dolby surround	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power requirementsKnown for one	AC 220 - 240 V +/- 10%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Speakers and microphoneKnown for one	5 x Flat NXT monolith speakers, Integrated subwoofer	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
I/O portsKnown for one	1 x S-Video Y/C in Video CVBS; 1 x Audio L/R in; 1 x Headphones out (3,5mm jack); 1 x CVBS in/out, RGB, Audio L/R (scart); 1 x CVBS in/out, Y/C, RGB, Audio L/R (scart); 1 x CVBS in,Audio L/R (scart); 1 x DVI-i; 1 x Audio out L/R; 1 x Centre Channel in for connection to a Home Cinema system; 1 x Subw	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons