Product comparison · 2 monitors

Philips Brilliance 298P4QJEB/27 computer monitor vs Philips Brilliance 298X4QJAB/27 computer monitor 73.7 cm (29") 2560 x 1080 pixels Quad HD LED Black

Add a product
  • 71specifications compared
  • 10differ
  • 61identical
  • 16known for one product only

Key differences

  • Pixel pitch
    • Brilliance 298P4QJEB/27 computer monitor:0.2628 x 0.2628 mm
    • Brilliance 298X4QJAB/27 computer monitor 73.7 cm (29") 2560 x 1080 pixels Quad HD LED Black:0.262 x 0.262 mm
  • Product colour
    • Brilliance 298P4QJEB/27 computer monitor:Black, Silver
    • Brilliance 298X4QJAB/27 computer monitor 73.7 cm (29") 2560 x 1080 pixels Quad HD LED Black:Black
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • Brilliance 298P4QJEB/27 computer monitor:38.5 W
    • Brilliance 298X4QJAB/27 computer monitor 73.7 cm (29") 2560 x 1080 pixels Quad HD LED Black:33.3 W
  • Depth (with stand)
    • Brilliance 298P4QJEB/27 computer monitor:273 mm
    • Brilliance 298X4QJAB/27 computer monitor 73.7 cm (29") 2560 x 1080 pixels Quad HD LED Black:197 mm
  • Height (with stand)
    • Brilliance 298P4QJEB/27 computer monitor:538 mm
    • Brilliance 298X4QJAB/27 computer monitor 73.7 cm (29") 2560 x 1080 pixels Quad HD LED Black:426 mm
  • Weight (with stand)
    • Brilliance 298P4QJEB/27 computer monitor:8.46 kg
    • Brilliance 298X4QJAB/27 computer monitor 73.7 cm (29") 2560 x 1080 pixels Quad HD LED Black:6.36 kg
  • Weight (without stand)
    • Brilliance 298P4QJEB/27 computer monitor:5.67 kg
    • Brilliance 298X4QJAB/27 computer monitor 73.7 cm (29") 2560 x 1080 pixels Quad HD LED Black:5.7 kg
  • Package dimensions (WxDxH)
    • Brilliance 298P4QJEB/27 computer monitor:782 x 506 x 186 mm
    • Brilliance 298X4QJAB/27 computer monitor 73.7 cm (29") 2560 x 1080 pixels Quad HD LED Black:782 x 505 x 159 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 298P4QJEB/27, 298X4QJAB/27
87 specifications
Display1 differ
Pixel pitchDiffers0.2628 x 0.2628 mm0.262 x 0.262 mm
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffersBlack, SilverBlack
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB hub versionKnown for one3.2 Gen 1 (3.1 Gen 1)Unknown — not stated by the source
USB Type-A downstream ports quantityKnown for one4Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Height adjustmentKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Adjustable height (max)Known for one15 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
PivotKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
SwivellingKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Swivel angle rangeKnown for one-65 - 65°Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs38.5 W33.3 W
Power consumption (PowerSave)Known for one25.1 WUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Depth (with stand)Differs273 mm197 mm
Height (with stand)Differs538 mm426 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs8.46 kg6.36 kg
Weight (without stand)Differs5.67 kg5.7 kg
Dimensions (W x D x H) with standKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source700 x 426 x 197 mm
Packaging data1 differ
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Differs782 x 506 x 186 mm782 x 505 x 159 mm
Package widthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source782 mm
Package depthKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source159 mm
Package heightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source505 mm
Package weightKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source8.85 kg
Other features2 differ
CertificationKnown for oneEnergyStar 6.0, EPEAT Gold*, TCO edge, RoHSUnknown — not stated by the source
Package dimensions (W x D x H)Differs782.3 x 505.5 x 185.4 mm (30.8 x 19.9 x 7.3")782.3 x 505.5 x 160 mm (30.8 x 19.9 x 6.3")
Weight (with stand) (imperial)Differs8.44 kg (18.6 lbs)6.35 kg (14 lbs)
On/off switchKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Recycling dataidentical
Overall recyclability rateKnown for one65%Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons