Product comparison · 2 monitors

Philips 2000 series 27E3C2200/00 computer monitor vs Philips 2000 series 32E3C2200/96 computer monitor

88specifications compared
28differ
60identical
20known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips 2000 series 27E3C2200/00 computer monitor has 500 :1 more contrast ratio (typical) than the Philips 2000 series 32E3C2200/96 computer monitor (4000:1 vs 3500:1). The Philips 2000 series 32E3C2200/96 computer monitor has 10.1 cm more viewable size, horizontal than the Philips 2000 series 27E3C2200/00 computer monitor (69.8 cm vs 59.7 cm). The Philips 2000 series 32E3C2200/96 computer monitor has 5.7 cm more viewable size, vertical than the Philips 2000 series 27E3C2200/00 computer monitor (39.3 cm vs 33.6 cm). Display diagonal: 68.6 cm (27") on the Philips 2000 series 27E3C2200/00 computer monitor, 80 cm (31.5") on the Philips 2000 series 32E3C2200/96 computer monitor. Pixel pitch: 0.3114 x 0.3114 mm on the Philips 2000 series 27E3C2200/00 computer monitor, 0.36375 x 0.36375 mm on the Philips 2000 series 32E3C2200/96 computer monitor.

Display diagonal
- 2000 series 27E3C2200/00 computer monitor:68.6 cm (27")
- 2000 series 32E3C2200/96 computer monitor:80 cm (31.5")
Contrast ratio (typical)
- 2000 series 27E3C2200/00 computer monitor:4000:1
- 2000 series 32E3C2200/96 computer monitor:3500:1
Pixel pitch
- 2000 series 27E3C2200/00 computer monitor:0.3114 x 0.3114 mm
- 2000 series 32E3C2200/96 computer monitor:0.36375 x 0.36375 mm
Viewable size, horizontal
- 2000 series 27E3C2200/00 computer monitor:59.7 cm
- 2000 series 32E3C2200/96 computer monitor:69.8 cm
Viewable size, vertical
- 2000 series 27E3C2200/00 computer monitor:33.6 cm
- 2000 series 32E3C2200/96 computer monitor:39.3 cm
Display diagonal (metric)
- 2000 series 27E3C2200/00 computer monitor:68.6 cm
- 2000 series 32E3C2200/96 computer monitor:80 cm
sRGB coverage (typical)
- 2000 series 27E3C2200/00 computer monitor:119.31%
- 2000 series 32E3C2200/96 computer monitor:102.3%
Adobe RGB coverage
- 2000 series 27E3C2200/00 computer monitor:91.3%
- 2000 series 32E3C2200/96 computer monitor:80.75%

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 27E3C2200/00, 32E3C2200/96
108 specifications	A Philips 2000 series 27E3C2200/00 computer monitor Model 27E3C2200/00 View product	B Philips 2000 series 32E3C2200/96 computer monitor Model 32E3C2200/96 View product
Display10 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	68.6 cm (27")	80 cm (31.5")
Anti-glare screenKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs	4000:1	3500:1
Viewing angle, horizontalKnown for one	178°	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewing angle, verticalKnown for one	178°	Unknown — not stated by the source
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.3114 x 0.3114 mm	0.36375 x 0.36375 mm
Pixel densityKnown for one	82 ppi	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size, horizontalDiffers	59.7 cm	69.8 cm
Viewable size, verticalDiffers	33.6 cm	39.3 cm
Display diagonal (metric)Differs	68.6 cm	80 cm
sRGB coverage (typical)Differs	119.31%	102.3%
Adobe RGB coverageDiffers	91.3%	80.75%
DCI-P3 coverageDiffers	95.07%	76.23%
Display panel sizeDiffers	27"/68.6cm	31.5"/80 cm
Screen curvature ratingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1500R
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	30 - 170 kHz
Vertical scan rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	48 - 144 Hz
Performanceidentical
NVIDIA G-SYNCKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
AMD FreeSyncKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Ports & interfacesidentical
DisplayPorts quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
DisplayPort versionKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1.4
Power3 differ
Energy efficiency class (SDR)Differs	D	Not available
Energy efficiency class (HDR)Differs	F	Not available
Energy consumption (SDR) per 1000 hoursKnown for one	16 kWh	Unknown — not stated by the source
Energy consumption (HDR) per 1000 hoursKnown for one	25 kWh	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (typical)Differs	20.25 W	20.3 W
Energy efficiency scaleKnown for one	A to G	Unknown — not stated by the source
AC input voltageKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 - 240 V
AC input frequencyKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	50/60 Hz
Weight & dimensions8 differ
Width (with stand)Differs	611 mm	709 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs	206 mm	240 mm
Height (with stand)Differs	459 mm	513 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs	3.77 kg	5.82 kg
Width (without stand)Differs	611 mm	709 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	66 mm	82 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	365 mm	426 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	3.45 kg	5.16 kg
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers	690 mm	830 mm
Package depthDiffers	139 mm	159 mm
Package heightDiffers	456 mm	559 mm
Package weightDiffers	6.1 kg	9.32 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Stand includedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
ManualKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Sustainability1 differ
Doesn't containDiffers	PVC/BFR	Lead, Mercury
Other features2 differ
SoftBlueKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Regulatory ApprovalsDiffers	CB, TUV/ISO9241-307, TUV-BAUART, EAC, EAC ROHS, CE Mark, UKCA, FCC, ICES-003, EMF	CB, TUV/ISO9241-307, TUV-BAUART, EAC, EAC ROHS, BSMI, CE Mark, UKCA, FCC, ICES-003, EMF
User controlsDiffers	Power On/Off, Menu, Brightness, Input, SmartImage	Menu, Brightness, Input, SmartImage, Power On/Off
Monitor sync input signalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Separate Sync

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons