Product comparison · 2 monitors

Philips 247E6EDAD/69 computer monitor vs Philips 257E7QDSB/00 computer monitor

74specifications compared
24differ
50identical
17known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- 247E6EDAD/69 computer monitor:59.9 cm (23.6")
- 257E7QDSB/00 computer monitor:63.5 cm (25")
Panel type
- 247E6EDAD/69 computer monitor:IPS-ADS
- 257E7QDSB/00 computer monitor:AH-IPS
Response time
- 247E6EDAD/69 computer monitor:5 ms
- 257E7QDSB/00 computer monitor:14 ms
Pixel pitch
- 247E6EDAD/69 computer monitor:0.2715 x 0.2715 mm
- 257E7QDSB/00 computer monitor:0.288 x 0.288 mm
Viewable size, horizontal
- 247E6EDAD/69 computer monitor:52.1 cm
- 257E7QDSB/00 computer monitor:55.3 cm
Viewable size, vertical
- 247E6EDAD/69 computer monitor:29.3 cm
- 257E7QDSB/00 computer monitor:30.9 cm
Built-in speaker(s)
- 247E6EDAD/69 computer monitor:Yes
- 257E7QDSB/00 computer monitor:No
Product colour
- 247E6EDAD/69 computer monitor:Black, Cherry (fruit)
- 257E7QDSB/00 computer monitor:Black

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 247E6EDAD/69, 257E7QDSB/00
91 specifications	A Philips 247E6EDAD/69 computer monitor Model 247E6EDAD/69 View product	B Philips 257E7QDSB/00 computer monitor Model 257E7QDSB/00 View product
Display6 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	59.9 cm (23.6")	63.5 cm (25")
Panel typeDiffers	IPS-ADS	AH-IPS
Response timeDiffers	5 ms	14 ms
Supported graphics resolutionsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Supported video modesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1080p
SmartResponseKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5 ms
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.2715 x 0.2715 mm	0.288 x 0.288 mm
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	30 - 83 kHz
Vertical scan rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	56 - 76 Hz
Viewable size, horizontalDiffers	52.1 cm	55.3 cm
Viewable size, verticalDiffers	29.3 cm	30.9 cm
3DKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Digital horizontal frequencyKnown for one	30 - 83 kHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Digital vertical frequencyKnown for one	56 - 75 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Multimedia1 differ
Built-in speaker(s)Differs	Yes	No
Number of speakersKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
RMS rated powerKnown for one	6 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffers	Black, Cherry (fruit)	Black
Feet colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Black
Ports & interfaces1 differ
DVI portDiffers	Yes	No
Headphone outKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
PC Audio inKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
HDCPKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
VESA mountingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 x 100 mm
Height adjustmentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	15.27 W	20.67 W
Weight & dimensions8 differ
Width (with stand)Differs	561 mm	577 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs	212 mm	213 mm
Height (with stand)Differs	429 mm	436 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs	3.65 kg	3.73 kg
Width (without stand)Differs	561 mm	577 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	43 mm	49 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	347 mm	346 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	3.27 kg	3.48 kg
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers	598 mm	619 mm
Package depthDiffers	100 mm	124 mm
Package heightDiffers	490 mm	492 mm
Package weightDiffers	4.9 kg	5.86 kg
Other features2 differ
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Differs	30000 h	50000 h
CertificationDiffers	RoHS, BSMI, CE Mark, cETLus, FCC Class B, GOST, PSB, SASO, SEMKO, TCO 6.0, TUV/ISO9241-307, WEEE, SGS	CE Mark, FCC Class B, VCCI, C-tick, CECP, CU, SASO, KUCAS, cETLus, SEMKO, TUV/ISO9241-307, EPA, WEEE, PSB, TCO certified

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons