Product comparison · 2 monitors

Philips Brilliance 245C5QSW/93 computer monitor vs Philips Brilliance 275C5QSW/93 computer monitor

Add a product
  • 77specifications compared
  • 18differ
  • 59identical
  • 7known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips Brilliance 275C5QSW/93 computer monitor has 7.1 cm more viewable size, horizontal than the Philips Brilliance 245C5QSW/93 computer monitor (59.8 cm vs 52.7 cm). The Philips Brilliance 275C5QSW/93 computer monitor has 4 cm more viewable size, vertical than the Philips Brilliance 245C5QSW/93 computer monitor (33.6 cm vs 29.6 cm). The Philips Brilliance 275C5QSW/93 computer monitor has 4.47 W more power consumption (typical) than the Philips Brilliance 245C5QSW/93 computer monitor (19.17 W vs 14.7 W). Display diagonal: 60.5 cm (23.8") on the Philips Brilliance 245C5QSW/93 computer monitor, 68.6 cm (27") on the Philips Brilliance 275C5QSW/93 computer monitor. Pixel pitch: 0.2745 x 0.2745 mm on the Philips Brilliance 245C5QSW/93 computer monitor, 0.3114 x 0.3114 mm on the Philips Brilliance 275C5QSW/93 computer monitor.

  • Display diagonal
    • Brilliance 245C5QSW/93 computer monitor:60.5 cm (23.8")
    • Brilliance 275C5QSW/93 computer monitor:68.6 cm (27")
  • Pixel pitch
    • Brilliance 245C5QSW/93 computer monitor:0.2745 x 0.2745 mm
    • Brilliance 275C5QSW/93 computer monitor:0.3114 x 0.3114 mm
  • Viewable size, horizontal
    • Brilliance 245C5QSW/93 computer monitor:52.7 cm
    • Brilliance 275C5QSW/93 computer monitor:59.8 cm
  • Viewable size, vertical
    • Brilliance 245C5QSW/93 computer monitor:29.6 cm
    • Brilliance 275C5QSW/93 computer monitor:33.6 cm
  • LED indicators
    • Brilliance 245C5QSW/93 computer monitor:Operation, Stand-by
    • Brilliance 275C5QSW/93 computer monitor:Power
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • Brilliance 245C5QSW/93 computer monitor:14.7 W
    • Brilliance 275C5QSW/93 computer monitor:19.17 W
  • Operating altitude
    • Brilliance 245C5QSW/93 computer monitor:0 - 3658 m
    • Brilliance 275C5QSW/93 computer monitor:0 - 3685 m
  • Width (with stand)
    • Brilliance 245C5QSW/93 computer monitor:540 mm
    • Brilliance 275C5QSW/93 computer monitor:613 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 245C5QSW/93, 275C5QSW/93
84 specifications
Display4 differ
Display diagonalDiffers60.5 cm (23.8")68.6 cm (27")
Supported graphics resolutionsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Pixel pitchDiffers0.2745 x 0.2745 mm0.3114 x 0.3114 mm
Viewable size, horizontalDiffers52.7 cm59.8 cm
Viewable size, verticalDiffers29.6 cm33.6 cm
Supported video modesKnown for one1080pUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfacesidentical
HDCPKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
AC (power) inKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceNo
Ergonomics1 differ
Number of OSD languagesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20
LED indicatorsDiffersOperation, Stand-byPower
VESA mountingKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs14.7 W19.17 W
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating altitudeDiffers0 - 3658 m0 - 3685 m
Weight & dimensions6 differ
Width (with stand)Differs540 mm613 mm
Height (with stand)Differs419 mm467 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs4.52 kg5.67 kg
Width (without stand)Differs540 mm613 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs39 mm42 mm
Height (without stand)Differs334 mm372 mm
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers608 mm730 mm
Package depthDiffers286 mm280 mm
Package heightDiffers486 mm557 mm
Package weightDiffers7.31 kg8.79 kg
Other features1 differ
CertificationDiffersRoHS, BSMI, CCC, CE Mark, cETLus, FCC Class B, GOST, SASO, SEMKO, TCO 6.0, TUV/ISO9241-307, WEEEBSMI, CCC, CE Mark, cETLus, FCC Class B, GOST, SASO, SEMKO, TCO 6.0, TUV/ISO9241-307, WEEE, RoHS
Recycling dataidentical
Overall recyclability rateKnown for one100%Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons