Product comparison · 2 monitors

Philips Brilliance IPS LCD monitor, LED backlight 231P4QRYEB/75 vs Philips Brilliance LCD monitor with Pivot base, USB, Audio 240P2EB/75

Add a product
  • 81specifications compared
  • 37differ
  • 44identical
  • 38known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips Brilliance LCD monitor with Pivot base, USB, Audio 240P2EB/75 has 50 cd/m² more display brightness (typical) than the Philips Brilliance IPS LCD monitor, LED backlight 231P4QRYEB/75 (300 cd/m² vs 250 cd/m²). The Philips Brilliance IPS LCD monitor, LED backlight 231P4QRYEB/75 has 9 ms more response time than the Philips Brilliance LCD monitor with Pivot base, USB, Audio 240P2EB/75 (14 ms vs 5 ms). The Philips Brilliance IPS LCD monitor, LED backlight 231P4QRYEB/75 has 19,500,000 :1 more contrast ratio (dynamic) than the Philips Brilliance LCD monitor with Pivot base, USB, Audio 240P2EB/75 (20000000:1 vs 500000:1). Display diagonal: 58.4 cm (23") on the Philips Brilliance IPS LCD monitor, LED backlight 231P4QRYEB/75, 61 cm (24") on the Philips Brilliance LCD monitor with Pivot base, USB, Audio 240P2EB/75. Display resolution: 1920 x 1080 pixels on the Philips Brilliance IPS LCD monitor, LED backlight 231P4QRYEB/75, 1920 x 1200 pixels on the Philips Brilliance LCD monitor with Pivot base, USB, Audio 240P2EB/75.

  • Display diagonal
    • Brilliance IPS LCD monitor, LED backlight 231P4QRYEB/75:58.4 cm (23")
    • Brilliance LCD monitor with Pivot base, USB, Audio 240P2EB/75:61 cm (24")
  • Display resolution
    • Brilliance IPS LCD monitor, LED backlight 231P4QRYEB/75:1920 x 1080 pixels
    • Brilliance LCD monitor with Pivot base, USB, Audio 240P2EB/75:1920 x 1200 pixels
  • Native aspect ratio
    • Brilliance IPS LCD monitor, LED backlight 231P4QRYEB/75:16:9
    • Brilliance LCD monitor with Pivot base, USB, Audio 240P2EB/75:16:10
  • Display technology
    • Brilliance IPS LCD monitor, LED backlight 231P4QRYEB/75:LED
    • Brilliance LCD monitor with Pivot base, USB, Audio 240P2EB/75:LCD
  • HD type
    • Brilliance IPS LCD monitor, LED backlight 231P4QRYEB/75:Full HD
    • Brilliance LCD monitor with Pivot base, USB, Audio 240P2EB/75:WUXGA
  • Panel type
    • Brilliance IPS LCD monitor, LED backlight 231P4QRYEB/75:IPS
    • Brilliance LCD monitor with Pivot base, USB, Audio 240P2EB/75:TFT
  • Display brightness (typical)
    • Brilliance IPS LCD monitor, LED backlight 231P4QRYEB/75:250 cd/m²
    • Brilliance LCD monitor with Pivot base, USB, Audio 240P2EB/75:300 cd/m²
  • Response time
    • Brilliance IPS LCD monitor, LED backlight 231P4QRYEB/75:14 ms
    • Brilliance LCD monitor with Pivot base, USB, Audio 240P2EB/75:5 ms

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 231P4QRYEB/75, 240P2EB/75
119 specifications
Display15 differ
Display diagonalDiffers58.4 cm (23")61 cm (24")
Display resolutionDiffers1920 x 1080 pixels1920 x 1200 pixels
Native aspect ratioDiffers16:916:10
Display technologyDiffersLEDLCD
HD typeDiffersFull HDWUXGA
Panel typeDiffersIPSTFT
Backlight typeKnown for oneW-LEDUnknown — not stated by the source
Display brightness (typical)Differs250 cd/m²300 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers14 ms5 ms
Supported graphics resolutionsDiffers1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
Aspect ratioDiffers16:916:10
Contrast ratio (typical)Known for one1000:1Unknown — not stated by the source
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Differs20000000:1500000:1
Display number of coloursDiffers16.78 million colours16.7 million colours
SmartResponseKnown for one7 msUnknown — not stated by the source
Pixel pitchDiffers0.265 x 0.265 mm0.27 x 0.27 mm
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers30 - 83 kHz24 - 94 kHz
Vertical scan rangeDiffers56 - 75 Hz48 - 85 Hz
3DKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Display diagonal (metric)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source61 cm
DDC/CIKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Display sRGBKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Display panel sizeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source24 inch / 61 cm
Performanceidentical
NVIDIA G-SYNCKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
AMD FreeSyncKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Designidentical
Feet colourKnown for oneBlackUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB upstream port typeKnown for oneUSB Type-BUnknown — not stated by the source
Number of upstream portsKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
USB Type-A downstream ports quantityDiffers41
DisplayPorts quantityKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Headphone outputsKnown for one1Unknown — not stated by the source
Headphone connectivityKnown for one3.5 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
PC Audio inKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Audio inputKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Audio outputKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Ergonomics3 differ
Adjustable height (max)Differs13 cm11 cm
On Screen Display (OSD) languagesDiffersSimplified Chinese, German, English, Spanish, French, Italian, Portuguese, RussianPortuguese, English, French, German, Italian, Russian, Simplified Chinese, Spanish
LED indicatorsDiffersOperation, Stand-byYes
Power3 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs29.1 W34.8 W
Power consumption (standby)Differs0.3 W0.8 W
Power consumption (off)Differs0 W0.5 W
Power consumption (PowerSave)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30.7 W
Power supply typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceInternal
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating altitudeKnown for one0 - 3658 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Non-operating altitudeKnown for one0 - 12192 mUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source20 - 80%
Weight & dimensions7 differ
Width (with stand)Differs547 mm559 mm
Height (with stand)Differs515 mm512 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs5.23 kg7.61 kg
Width (without stand)Differs547 mm559 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs60 mm75 mm
Height (without stand)Differs343 mm381 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs3.09 kg5.41 kg
Packaging data4 differ
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one600 x 400 x 263 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Package widthDiffers600 mm690 mm
Package depthDiffers263 mm277 mm
Package heightDiffers400 mm456 mm
Package weightDiffers7.7 kg10.3 kg
Sustainability1 differ
Sustainability certificatesDiffersEPEAT Gold, ENERGY STAREPEAT Silver, ENERGY STAR
Other features3 differ
Effective viewing areaKnown for one509.18 x 286.41 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Heavy metals freeKnown for oneHg (mercury), Pb (lead)Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (economy mode)Differs18 W30.7 W
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Differs30000 h50000 h
CertificationDiffersBSMI, CCC, CE Mark, FCC Class B, GOST, SASO, SEMKO, TCO 5.2, TUV Ergo, TUV/GS, UL/cUL, WEEE, RoHSRoHS
Compatible operating systemsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceWindows 7/Vista/XP; Mac OS X
Exterior finish typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceTextured
Monitor sync input signalKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSeparate Sync; Sync on Green
Signal inputKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceVGA (Analog ); DVI-D (digital, HDCP)
Compliance industry standardsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBSMI, CE Mark, FCC, Class B, GOST, SEMKO, TCO 5.0, TUV/GS, TUV Ergo, UL/cUL
Picture enhancementKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSmartImage
Regulatory ApprovalsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBSMI; CE Mark; FCC; Class B; GOST; SEMKO; TCO 5.0; TUV/GS; TUV Ergo; UL/cUL
User controlsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSmartImage; Volume; Brightness; Menu; Auto; Power On/Off
Recycling dataidentical
Overall recyclability rateKnown for one65%Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons