All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 monitors

Philips 227E6QDSW/96 computer monitor vs Philips 276E6ADSW/96 computer monitor

Add a product
  • 79specifications compared
  • 26differ
  • 53identical
  • 7known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips 276E6ADSW/96 computer monitor has 50 cd/m² more display brightness (typical) than the Philips 227E6QDSW/96 computer monitor (300 cd/m² vs 250 cd/m²). The Philips 276E6ADSW/96 computer monitor has 12.1 cm more viewable size, horizontal than the Philips 227E6QDSW/96 computer monitor (59.8 cm vs 47.7 cm). The Philips 276E6ADSW/96 computer monitor has 6.8 cm more viewable size, vertical than the Philips 227E6QDSW/96 computer monitor (33.6 cm vs 26.8 cm). Display diagonal: 54.6 cm (21.5") on the Philips 227E6QDSW/96 computer monitor, 68.6 cm (27") on the Philips 276E6ADSW/96 computer monitor. Aspect ratio: 16:9 on the Philips 227E6QDSW/96 computer monitor, 4:3, 16:9 on the Philips 276E6ADSW/96 computer monitor.

  • Display diagonal
    • 54.6 cm (21.5")
    • 68.6 cm (27")
  • Display brightness (typical)
    • 250 cd/m²
    • 300 cd/m²
  • Aspect ratio
    • 16:9
    • 4:3, 16:9
  • Pixel pitch
    • 0.248 x 0.248 mm
    • 0.311 x 0.311 mm
  • Vertical scan range
    • 56 - 76 Hz
    • 56 - 75 Hz
  • Viewable size, horizontal
    • 47.7 cm
    • 59.8 cm
  • Viewable size, vertical
    • 26.8 cm
    • 33.6 cm
  • Product colour
    • White
    • Gold, White

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
86 specifications
A

Philips

227E6QDSW/96 computer monitor

Model 227E6QDSW/96

View product
B

Philips

276E6ADSW/96 computer monitor

Model 276E6ADSW/96

View product
Display7 differ
Display diagonalDiffers54.6 cm (21.5")68.6 cm (27")
Display brightness (typical)Differs250 cd/m²300 cd/m²
Aspect ratioDiffers16:94:3, 16:9
Pixel pitchDiffers0.248 x 0.248 mm0.311 x 0.311 mm
Vertical scan rangeDiffers56 - 76 Hz56 - 75 Hz
Viewable size, horizontalDiffers47.7 cm59.8 cm
Viewable size, verticalDiffers26.8 cm33.6 cm
Supported video modesKnown for one1080p
Design2 differ
Product colourDiffersWhiteGold, White
Feet colourDiffersWhiteGold
Ports & interfacesidentical
DVI-D ports quantityKnown for one1
AC (power) inKnown for oneNo
Ergonomics2 differ
On Screen Display (OSD) languagesDiffersSimplified Chinese, Traditional Chinese, Czech, German, Dutch, English, Spanish, Finnish, French, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Swedish, Turkish, UkrainianTraditional Chinese, Czech, German, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Turkish, Ukrainian
Number of OSD languagesKnown for one20
LED indicatorsDiffersYesPower
VESA mountingKnown for oneNo
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs15.52 W25.89 W
Weight & dimensions8 differ
Width (with stand)Differs511 mm640 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs212 mm235 mm
Height (with stand)Differs400 mm471 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs2.95 kg5.33 kg
Width (without stand)Differs511 mm640 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs36 mm48 mm
Height (without stand)Differs318 mm390 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs2.58 kg4.57 kg
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers569 mm708 mm
Package depthDiffers120 mm125 mm
Package heightDiffers466 mm562 mm
Package weightDiffers4.51 kg7.04 kg
Other features2 differ
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Differs30000 h50000 h
CertificationKnown for oneCCC, CSC, CEL, TCO 6.0, WEEE, RoHS
Supplied AC adapter typeDiffersLEDLCD
Recycling dataidentical
Overall recyclability rateKnown for one100%

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons