Product comparison · 2 monitors

Philips 226V6QSB6/69 computer monitor vs Philips 247E6EDAD/69 computer monitor

Add a product
  • 73specifications compared
  • 28differ
  • 45identical
  • 16known for one product only

Key differences

  • Display diagonal
    • 226V6QSB6/69 computer monitor:54.6 cm (21.5")
    • 247E6EDAD/69 computer monitor:59.9 cm (23.6")
  • Panel type
    • 226V6QSB6/69 computer monitor:AH-IPS
    • 247E6EDAD/69 computer monitor:IPS-ADS
  • Response time
    • 226V6QSB6/69 computer monitor:8 ms
    • 247E6EDAD/69 computer monitor:5 ms
  • Contrast ratio (dynamic)
    • 226V6QSB6/69 computer monitor:10000000:1
    • 247E6EDAD/69 computer monitor:20000000:1
  • Pixel pitch
    • 226V6QSB6/69 computer monitor:0.248 x 0.248 mm
    • 247E6EDAD/69 computer monitor:0.2715 x 0.2715 mm
  • Viewable size, horizontal
    • 226V6QSB6/69 computer monitor:47.6 cm
    • 247E6EDAD/69 computer monitor:52.1 cm
  • Viewable size, vertical
    • 226V6QSB6/69 computer monitor:26.8 cm
    • 247E6EDAD/69 computer monitor:29.3 cm
  • Built-in speaker(s)
    • 226V6QSB6/69 computer monitor:No
    • 247E6EDAD/69 computer monitor:Yes

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 226V6QSB6/69, 247E6EDAD/69
89 specifications
Display7 differ
Display diagonalDiffers54.6 cm (21.5")59.9 cm (23.6")
Panel typeDiffersAH-IPSIPS-ADS
Response timeDiffers8 ms5 ms
Supported graphics resolutionsKnown for one1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)Unknown — not stated by the source
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Differs10000000:120000000:1
Pixel pitchDiffers0.248 x 0.248 mm0.2715 x 0.2715 mm
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for one30 - 83 kHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Vertical scan rangeKnown for one56 - 76 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size, horizontalDiffers47.6 cm52.1 cm
Viewable size, verticalDiffers26.8 cm29.3 cm
3DKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Digital horizontal frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 - 83 kHz
Digital vertical frequencyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source56 - 75 Hz
Multimedia1 differ
Built-in speaker(s)DiffersNoYes
Number of speakersKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source2
RMS rated powerKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source6 W
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffersBlackBlack, Cherry (fruit)
Feet colourKnown for oneBlackUnknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces2 differ
DVI portDiffersNoYes
HDMI ports quantityDiffers01
Headphone outKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
PC Audio inKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Ergonomics1 differ
VESA mountingKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one100 x 100 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Height adjustmentKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
On Screen Display (OSD)DiffersNoYes
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs25.2 W15.27 W
Power consumption (off)Differs0.5 W0.3 W
Weight & dimensions8 differ
Width (with stand)Differs500 mm561 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs200 mm212 mm
Height (with stand)Differs372 mm429 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs2.5 kg3.65 kg
Width (without stand)Differs500 mm561 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs39 mm43 mm
Height (without stand)Differs306 mm347 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs2.2 kg3.27 kg
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers560 mm598 mm
Package depthDiffers110 mm100 mm
Package heightDiffers438 mm490 mm
Package weightDiffers3.79 kg4.9 kg
Other features2 differ
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Differs50000 h30000 h
CertificationDiffersCE Mark, FCC Class B, WEEE, CCC, CECPRoHS, BSMI, CE Mark, cETLus, FCC Class B, GOST, PSB, SASO, SEMKO, TCO 6.0, TUV/ISO9241-307, WEEE, SGS
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceEPEAT Silver, ENERGY STAR

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons