Product comparison · 2 monitors

Philips Brilliance 225BL2CB/27 computer monitor vs Philips Brilliance LCD monitor, LED backlight 241P4LRYEB/69

78specifications compared
26differ
52identical
26known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips Brilliance 225BL2CB/27 computer monitor has 6° more viewing angle, horizontal than the Philips Brilliance LCD monitor, LED backlight 241P4LRYEB/69 (176° vs 170°). The Philips Brilliance 225BL2CB/27 computer monitor has 10° more viewing angle, vertical than the Philips Brilliance LCD monitor, LED backlight 241P4LRYEB/69 (170° vs 160°). The Philips Brilliance LCD monitor, LED backlight 241P4LRYEB/69 has 2 more USB Type-A downstream ports quantity than the Philips Brilliance 225BL2CB/27 computer monitor (4 vs 2). Display diagonal: 55.9 cm (22") on the Philips Brilliance 225BL2CB/27 computer monitor, 61 cm (24") on the Philips Brilliance LCD monitor, LED backlight 241P4LRYEB/69. Display resolution: 1680 x 1050 pixels on the Philips Brilliance 225BL2CB/27 computer monitor, 1920 x 1080 pixels on the Philips Brilliance LCD monitor, LED backlight 241P4LRYEB/69.

Display diagonal
- Brilliance 225BL2CB/27 computer monitor:55.9 cm (22")
- Brilliance LCD monitor, LED backlight 241P4LRYEB/69:61 cm (24")
Display resolution
- Brilliance 225BL2CB/27 computer monitor:1680 x 1050 pixels
- Brilliance LCD monitor, LED backlight 241P4LRYEB/69:1920 x 1080 pixels
Native aspect ratio
- Brilliance 225BL2CB/27 computer monitor:16:10
- Brilliance LCD monitor, LED backlight 241P4LRYEB/69:16:9
Aspect ratio
- Brilliance 225BL2CB/27 computer monitor:16:10
- Brilliance LCD monitor, LED backlight 241P4LRYEB/69:16:9
Viewing angle, horizontal
- Brilliance 225BL2CB/27 computer monitor:176°
- Brilliance LCD monitor, LED backlight 241P4LRYEB/69:170°
Viewing angle, vertical
- Brilliance 225BL2CB/27 computer monitor:170°
- Brilliance LCD monitor, LED backlight 241P4LRYEB/69:160°
Pixel pitch
- Brilliance 225BL2CB/27 computer monitor:0.282 x 0.282 mm
- Brilliance LCD monitor, LED backlight 241P4LRYEB/69:0.276 x 0.276 mm
Feet colour
- Brilliance 225BL2CB/27 computer monitor:Black
- Brilliance LCD monitor, LED backlight 241P4LRYEB/69:Black, Silver

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 225BL2CB/27, 241P4LRYEB/69
104 specifications	A Philips Brilliance 225BL2CB/27 computer monitor Model 225BL2CB/27 View product	B Philips Brilliance LCD monitor, LED backlight 241P4LRYEB/69 Model 241P4LRYEB/69 View product
Display7 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	55.9 cm (22")	61 cm (24")
Display resolutionDiffers	1680 x 1050 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels
Native aspect ratioDiffers	16:10	16:9
HD typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Full HD
Screen shapeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Flat
Aspect ratioDiffers	16:10	16:9
Contrast ratio (typical)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1000:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	176°	170°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	170°	160°
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.282 x 0.282 mm	0.276 x 0.276 mm
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	53.1 cm
Viewable size, verticalKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	29.9 cm
Supported graphics resolutionsKnown for one	1680 x 1050 (WSXGA+)	Unknown — not stated by the source
Sync-on-green (SOG)Known for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Separate H/V syncKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Design1 differ
Feet colourDiffers	Black	Black, Silver
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB Type-A downstream ports quantityDiffers	2	4
DisplayPorts quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Headphone outKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
PC Audio inKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Audio inputKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Audio outputKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomics2 differ
Adjustable height (max)Differs	7 cm	13 cm
PivotKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Pivot angleKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0 - 90°
Number of OSD languagesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	8
LED indicatorsDiffers	Power	Operation, Stand-by
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	22.5 W	21.5 W
Power consumption (off)Known for one	0 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Power consumption (PowerSave)Known for one	12 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions8 differ
Width (with stand)Differs	505 mm	565 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs	249 mm	220 mm
Height (with stand)Differs	484 mm	518 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs	5.17 kg	6.35 kg
Width (without stand)Differs	505 mm	565 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	59 mm	55 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	351 mm	352 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	4.15 kg	4.2 kg
Dimensions (W x D x H) with standKnown for one	484 x 505 x 249 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers	565 mm	605 mm
Package depthDiffers	175 mm	252 mm
Package heightDiffers	468 mm	442 mm
Package weightDiffers	6.92 kg	8.8 kg
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	468 x 565 x 175 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other features2 differ
ECO modeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Heavy metals freeDiffers	Hg (mercury)	Hg (mercury), Pb (lead)
Power consumption (economy mode)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	12.3 W
CertificationKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	TCO edge, TCO 5.2, RoHS, BSMI, CE Mark, FCC Class B, GOST, SASO, SEMKO, TUV Ergo, TUV/GS, UL/cUL, WEEE
Supplied AC adapter typeDiffers	LCD	LED
Compliance industry standardsKnown for one	BSMI, CE Mark, FCC, Class B, GOST, SEMKO, TCO 5.0, TUV/GS, TUV Ergo, UL/cUL	Unknown — not stated by the source
Package dimensions (W x D x H)Known for one	468.1 x 564.9 x 175 mm (18.4 x 22.2 x 6.89")	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight (with stand) (imperial)Known for one	5.16 kg (11.4 lbs)	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons