Product comparison · 2 monitors

Philips 224E5QSW/96 computer monitor vs Philips Brilliance LCD monitor with SmartImage 240S1SS/05

64specifications compared
34differ
30identical
21known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips Brilliance LCD monitor with SmartImage 240S1SS/05 has 50 cd/m² more display brightness (typical) than the Philips 224E5QSW/96 computer monitor (300 cd/m² vs 250 cd/m²). The Philips 224E5QSW/96 computer monitor has 9 ms more response time than the Philips Brilliance LCD monitor with SmartImage 240S1SS/05 (14 ms vs 5 ms). The Philips 224E5QSW/96 computer monitor has 19,975,000 :1 more contrast ratio (dynamic) than the Philips Brilliance LCD monitor with SmartImage 240S1SS/05 (20000000:1 vs 25000:1). Display diagonal: 54.6 cm (21.5") on the Philips 224E5QSW/96 computer monitor, 61 cm (24") on the Philips Brilliance LCD monitor with SmartImage 240S1SS/05. Native aspect ratio: 16:9 on the Philips 224E5QSW/96 computer monitor, 16:10 on the Philips Brilliance LCD monitor with SmartImage 240S1SS/05.

Display diagonal
- 224E5QSW/96 computer monitor:54.6 cm (21.5")
- Brilliance LCD monitor with SmartImage 240S1SS/05:61 cm (24")
Native aspect ratio
- 224E5QSW/96 computer monitor:16:9
- Brilliance LCD monitor with SmartImage 240S1SS/05:16:10
Display technology
- 224E5QSW/96 computer monitor:LED
- Brilliance LCD monitor with SmartImage 240S1SS/05:LCD
Panel type
- 224E5QSW/96 computer monitor:AH-IPS
- Brilliance LCD monitor with SmartImage 240S1SS/05:TFT
Display brightness (typical)
- 224E5QSW/96 computer monitor:250 cd/m²
- Brilliance LCD monitor with SmartImage 240S1SS/05:300 cd/m²
Response time
- 224E5QSW/96 computer monitor:14 ms
- Brilliance LCD monitor with SmartImage 240S1SS/05:5 ms
Supported graphics resolutions
- 224E5QSW/96 computer monitor:1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
- Brilliance LCD monitor with SmartImage 240S1SS/05:1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
Aspect ratio
- 224E5QSW/96 computer monitor:16:9
- Brilliance LCD monitor with SmartImage 240S1SS/05:16:10

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 224E5QSW/96, 240S1SS/05
85 specifications	A Philips 224E5QSW/96 computer monitor Model 224E5QSW/96 View product	B Philips Brilliance LCD monitor with SmartImage 240S1SS/05 Model 240S1SS/05 View product
Display12 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	54.6 cm (21.5")	61 cm (24")
Native aspect ratioDiffers	16:9	16:10
Display technologyDiffers	LED	LCD
Panel typeDiffers	AH-IPS	TFT
Display brightness (typical)Differs	250 cd/m²	300 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers	14 ms	5 ms
Supported graphics resolutionsDiffers	1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)	1920 x 1200 (WUXGA)
Aspect ratioDiffers	16:9	16:10
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Differs	20000000:1	25000:1
Dynamic contrast ratio marketing nameKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	SmartContrast
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.248 x 0.248 mm	0.27 x 0.27 mm
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers	30 - 83 kHz	24 - 94 kHz
Vertical scan rangeDiffers	56 - 75 Hz	48 - 85 Hz
Sync-on-green (SOG)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
DDC/CIKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Contrast ratio (typical)Known for one	1000:1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Multimediaidentical
Built-in speaker(s)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffers	White	Black, Silver
Feet colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Black
Ports & interfacesidentical
HDMI ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	0
HDCPKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomics2 differ
Height adjustmentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	No
On Screen Display (OSD) languagesDiffers	Simplified Chinese, Czech, German, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Turkish, Ukrainian	Simplified Chinese, German, English, Spanish, French, Portuguese, Russian
Number of OSD languagesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	8
LED indicatorsDiffers	Yes	Operation, Stand-by
Power4 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	18.9 W	34.8 W
Power consumption (standby)Differs	0.5 W	0.8 W
Power consumption (off)Differs	0.3 W	0.5 W
AC input voltageDiffers	110 - 240 V	100 - 240 V
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating altitudeKnown for one	0 - 3658 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Non-operating altitudeKnown for one	0 - 12192 m	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions8 differ
Width (with stand)Differs	500 mm	469 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs	213 mm	220 mm
Height (with stand)Differs	394 mm	559 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs	3.14 kg	5.8 kg
Width (without stand)Differs	500 mm	381 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	47 mm	75 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	306 mm	559 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	2.82 kg	5.4 kg
Dimensions (W x D x H) with standKnown for one	500 x 394 x 213 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers	562 mm	546 mm
Package depthDiffers	106 mm	188 mm
Package heightDiffers	466 mm	638 mm
Package weightDiffers	5.01 kg	7.8 kg
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one	562 x 466 x 106 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Other features3 differ
ECO modeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power consumption (economy mode)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	30.7 W
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Differs	30000 h	50000 h
CertificationDiffers	RoHS, BSMI, CE Mark, cETLus, FCC B, GOST, PSB, SASO, SEMKO, TCO	BSMI, CE Mark, FCC, Class B, GOST, SEMKO, TCO 5.0, TUV/GS, TUV Ergo, UL/cUL
Supplied AC adapter typeDiffers	LED	LCD
Effective viewing areaKnown for one	476.1 x 267.8 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Recycling dataidentical
Overall recyclability rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100%
Packaging recyclability rateKnown for one	100%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons