All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 monitors

Philips 224E5EDSW/93 computer monitor vs Philips 243V5QSW/93 computer monitor

Add a product
  • 78specifications compared
  • 29differ
  • 49identical
  • 9known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips 224E5EDSW/93 computer monitor has 5.5 ms more response time than the Philips 243V5QSW/93 computer monitor (14 ms vs 8.5 ms). The Philips 243V5QSW/93 computer monitor has 2,000 :1 more contrast ratio (typical) than the Philips 224E5EDSW/93 computer monitor (3000:1 vs 1000:1). The Philips 224E5EDSW/93 computer monitor has 10,000,000 :1 more contrast ratio (dynamic) than the Philips 243V5QSW/93 computer monitor (20000000:1 vs 10000000:1). Only the Philips 224E5EDSW/93 computer monitor has DVI port. Display diagonal: 54.6 cm (21.5") on the Philips 224E5EDSW/93 computer monitor, 59.9 cm (23.6") on the Philips 243V5QSW/93 computer monitor.

  • Display diagonal
    • 54.6 cm (21.5")
    • 59.9 cm (23.6")
  • Panel type
    • AH-IPS
    • MVA
  • Response time
    • 14 ms
    • 8.5 ms
  • Contrast ratio (typical)
    • 1000:1
    • 3000:1
  • Contrast ratio (dynamic)
    • 20000000:1
    • 10000000:1
  • Pixel pitch
    • 0.248 x 0.248 mm
    • 0.272 x 0.272 mm
  • Vertical scan range
    • 56 - 76 Hz
    • 56 - 75 Hz
  • Viewable size, horizontal
    • 47.6 cm
    • 52.1 cm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
87 specifications
A

Philips

224E5EDSW/93 computer monitor

Model 224E5EDSW/93

View product
B

Philips

243V5QSW/93 computer monitor

Model 243V5QSW/93

View product
Display9 differ
Display diagonalDiffers54.6 cm (21.5")59.9 cm (23.6")
Panel typeDiffersAH-IPSMVA
Backlight typeKnown for oneW-LED
Response timeDiffers14 ms8.5 ms
Supported graphics resolutionsKnown for one1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs1000:13000:1
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Differs20000000:110000000:1
Pixel pitchDiffers0.248 x 0.248 mm0.272 x 0.272 mm
Vertical scan rangeDiffers56 - 76 Hz56 - 75 Hz
Viewable size, horizontalDiffers47.6 cm52.1 cm
Viewable size, verticalDiffers26.8 cm29.3 cm
Supported video modesKnown for one1080p
SmartResponseKnown for one5 ms
Designidentical
Feet colourKnown for oneWhite
Ports & interfaces2 differ
DVI portDiffersYesNo
HDMI ports quantityDiffers10
AC (power) inKnown for oneYes
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)Known for oneYes
Ergonomics1 differ
Number of OSD languagesKnown for one20
LED indicatorsDiffersOperation, Stand-byPower
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs15.25 W21.07 W
Power consumption (off)Differs0.3 W0.5 W
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating altitudeDiffers0 - 3658 m0 - 3685 m
Weight & dimensions8 differ
Width (with stand)Differs500 mm551 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs213 mm220 mm
Height (with stand)Differs394 mm420 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs3.14 kg3.66 kg
Width (without stand)Differs500 mm551 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs47 mm52 mm
Height (without stand)Differs306 mm344 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs2.82 kg3.22 kg
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers558 mm607 mm
Package depthDiffers123 mm129 mm
Package heightDiffers466 mm422 mm
Package weightDiffers4.83 kg5.04 kg
Other features2 differ
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Differs50000 h30000 h
CertificationDiffersRoHS, CE Mark, FCC Class B, CU, EAC, SASO, KUCAS, cETLus, SEMKO, TUV/ISO9241-307, EPA, WEEE, PSB, CECP, VCCI, KCC, KC, TUV, CCCBSMI, CCC, CE Mark, cETLus, FCC Class B, GOST, PSB, SASO, SEMKO, TCO certified, TUV/ISO9241-307, WEEE, RoHS
Recycling dataidentical
Overall recyclability rateKnown for one100%

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons