Product comparison · 2 monitors

Philips LCD monitor 223S5LSB/00 vs Philips V Line LCD monitor with SmartControl Lite 223V5LHSB2/01

91specifications compared
11differ
80identical
18known for one product only

Key differences

Display brightness (typical)
- LCD monitor 223S5LSB/00:250 cd/m²
- V Line LCD monitor with SmartControl Lite 223V5LHSB2/01:200 cd/m²
Contrast ratio (typical)
- LCD monitor 223S5LSB/00:1000:1
- V Line LCD monitor with SmartControl Lite 223V5LHSB2/01:600:1
Viewing angle, horizontal
- LCD monitor 223S5LSB/00:170°
- V Line LCD monitor with SmartControl Lite 223V5LHSB2/01:90°
Viewing angle, vertical
- LCD monitor 223S5LSB/00:160°
- V Line LCD monitor with SmartControl Lite 223V5LHSB2/01:65°
HDMI ports quantity
- LCD monitor 223S5LSB/00:0
- V Line LCD monitor with SmartControl Lite 223V5LHSB2/01:1
Sustainability certificates
- LCD monitor 223S5LSB/00:ENERGY STAR
- V Line LCD monitor with SmartControl Lite 223V5LHSB2/01:EPEAT Silver, ENERGY STAR
Heavy metals free
- LCD monitor 223S5LSB/00:Hg (mercury), Pb (lead)
- V Line LCD monitor with SmartControl Lite 223V5LHSB2/01:Hg (mercury)

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 223S5LSB/00, 223V5LHSB2/01
109 specifications	A Philips LCD monitor 223S5LSB/00 Model 223S5LSB/00 View product	B Philips V Line LCD monitor with SmartControl Lite 223V5LHSB2/01 Model 223V5LHSB2/01 View product
Display4 differ
Display brightness (typical)Differs	250 cd/m²	200 cd/m²
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs	1000:1	600:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	170°	90°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	160°	65°
SmartResponseKnown for one	5 ms	Unknown — not stated by the source
Separate H/V syncKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Dynamic contrast ratio marketing nameKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	SmartContrast
Maximum refresh rateKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	60 Hz
Performanceidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Market positioningKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Home
Feet colourKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Black
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Built-in USB hubKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
DVI-D ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
HDMI ports quantityDiffers	0	1
AC (power) inKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Number of OSD languagesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	21
Poweridentical
Energy efficiency class (SDR)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	E
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	VGA, AC
Sustainability1 differ
Sustainability certificatesDiffers	ENERGY STAR	EPEAT Silver, ENERGY STAR
Other features5 differ
Heavy metals freeDiffers	Hg (mercury), Pb (lead)	Hg (mercury)
Signal inputDiffers	VGA (Analog ); DVI-D (digital, HDCP)	HDMI (digital, HDCP); VGA (Analog )
CertificationDiffers	CE Mark, FCC Class B, EAC, SEMKO, BSMI, cETLus, TUV/ISO9241-307, WEEE	BSMI, CE Mark, FCC Class B, SEMKO, TUV/ISO9241-307, cETLus, EAC, INMETRO
Regulatory ApprovalsDiffers	CE Mark; FCC Class B; EAC; SEMKO; BSMI; cETLus; TUV/ISO9241-307; WEEE	BSMI; CE Mark; FCC Class B; SEMKO; TUV/ISO9241-307; cETLus; EAC; INMETRO
User controlsDiffers	Power On/Off; Menu/OK; Brightness/Back; 4:3 Wide/Up; Auto/Down	Auto/Down; 4:3 Wide/Up; Brightness/Back; Menu/OK; Power On/Off
On/off switchKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Energy efficiency class (legacy scale)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	E
Recycling dataidentical
Overall recyclability rateKnown for one	100%	Unknown — not stated by the source
Thin Clientidentical
Thin client installedKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons