Product comparison · 2 monitors

Philips Brilliance LED monitor 221P3LPYEB/00 vs Philips Brilliance LED Monitor 221S3LCB/00

72specifications compared
15differ
57identical
17known for one product only

Key differences

Built-in speaker(s)
- Brilliance LED monitor 221P3LPYEB/00:Yes
- Brilliance LED Monitor 221S3LCB/00:No
USB Type-A downstream ports quantity
- Brilliance LED monitor 221P3LPYEB/00:4
- Brilliance LED Monitor 221S3LCB/00:0
Adjustable height (max)
- Brilliance LED monitor 221P3LPYEB/00:13 cm
- Brilliance LED Monitor 221S3LCB/00:7 cm
Pivot
- Brilliance LED monitor 221P3LPYEB/00:Yes
- Brilliance LED Monitor 221S3LCB/00:No
Power consumption (typical)
- Brilliance LED monitor 221P3LPYEB/00:17.8 W
- Brilliance LED Monitor 221S3LCB/00:16.81 W
Power consumption (standby)
- Brilliance LED monitor 221P3LPYEB/00:0.5 W
- Brilliance LED Monitor 221S3LCB/00:0.1 W
Power consumption (off)
- Brilliance LED monitor 221P3LPYEB/00:0 W
- Brilliance LED Monitor 221S3LCB/00:0.1 W
Height (with stand)
- Brilliance LED monitor 221P3LPYEB/00:487 mm
- Brilliance LED Monitor 221S3LCB/00:400 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 221P3LPYEB/00, 221S3LCB/00
89 specifications	A Philips Brilliance LED monitor 221P3LPYEB/00 Model 221P3LPYEB/00 View product	B Philips Brilliance LED Monitor 221S3LCB/00 Model 221S3LCB/00 View product
Performanceidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for one	Windows 7 Home Premium, Windows 7 Home Premium x64, Windows 7 Professional, Windows 7 Professional x64, Windows 7 Starter, Windows 7 Starter x64, Windows 7 Ultimate, Windows 7 Ultimate x64, Windows Vista Business, Windows Vista Business x64, Windows Vista Home Basic, Windows Vista Home Basic x64, Wi	Unknown — not stated by the source
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Multimedia1 differ
Built-in speaker(s)Differs	Yes	No
Number of speakersKnown for one	2	Unknown — not stated by the source
RMS rated powerKnown for one	3 W	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ports & interfaces1 differ
USB hub versionKnown for one	2.0	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB Type-A downstream ports quantityDiffers	4	0
DisplayPorts quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Headphone outputsKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
Headphone connectivityKnown for one	3.5 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
PC Audio inKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomics2 differ
Adjustable height (max)Differs	13 cm	7 cm
PivotDiffers	Yes	No
Pivot angleKnown for one	0 - 90°	Unknown — not stated by the source
SwivellingKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Tilt adjustmentKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Number of OSD languagesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	8
Power3 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	17.8 W	16.81 W
Power consumption (standby)Differs	0.5 W	0.1 W
Power consumption (off)Differs	0 W	0.1 W
Power consumption (PowerSave)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	15.43 W
Weight & dimensions3 differ
Height (with stand)Differs	487 mm	400 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs	5.64 kg	4.83 kg
Weight (without stand)Differs	3.51 kg	3.46 kg
Packaging data3 differ
Package depthDiffers	262 mm	175 mm
Package heightDiffers	377 mm	466 mm
Package weightDiffers	7.43 kg	6.67 kg
Sustainability1 differ
Sustainability certificatesDiffers	EPEAT Gold, ENERGY STAR	EPEAT Silver, ENERGY STAR
Other features1 differ
Display viewable area (HxV)Known for one	476.6 x 268.1 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationDiffers	RoHS, BSMI, CE Mark, FCC Class B, GOST, SEMKO, TCO 5.1, TUV Ergo, TUV/GS, UL/cUL	RoHS
Compliance industry standardsKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	BSMI, CE Mark, FCC Class B, GOST, SEMKO, TCO 5.1, TUV Ergo, TUV/GS, UL/cUL
Picture enhancementKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	SmartImage

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons