Product comparison · 2 monitors

Philips 216V6LSB2/93 computer monitor vs Philips 222I6LSB2/93 computer monitor

Add a product
  • 77specifications compared
  • 22differ
  • 55identical
  • 4known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips 222I6LSB2/93 computer monitor has 20 cd/m² more display brightness (typical) than the Philips 216V6LSB2/93 computer monitor (220 cd/m² vs 200 cd/m²). The Philips 222I6LSB2/93 computer monitor has 1.9 cm more viewable size, horizontal than the Philips 216V6LSB2/93 computer monitor (47.7 cm vs 45.8 cm). The Philips 222I6LSB2/93 computer monitor has 1 cm more viewable size, vertical than the Philips 216V6LSB2/93 computer monitor (26.8 cm vs 25.8 cm). Display diagonal: 52.6 cm (20.7") on the Philips 216V6LSB2/93 computer monitor, 54.6 cm (21.5") on the Philips 222I6LSB2/93 computer monitor. Pixel pitch: 0.2385 x 0.2385 mm on the Philips 216V6LSB2/93 computer monitor, 0.248 x 0.248 mm on the Philips 222I6LSB2/93 computer monitor.

  • Display diagonal
    • 216V6LSB2/93 computer monitor:52.6 cm (20.7")
    • 222I6LSB2/93 computer monitor:54.6 cm (21.5")
  • Display brightness (typical)
    • 216V6LSB2/93 computer monitor:200 cd/m²
    • 222I6LSB2/93 computer monitor:220 cd/m²
  • Pixel pitch
    • 216V6LSB2/93 computer monitor:0.2385 x 0.2385 mm
    • 222I6LSB2/93 computer monitor:0.248 x 0.248 mm
  • Vertical scan range
    • 216V6LSB2/93 computer monitor:56 - 76 Hz
    • 222I6LSB2/93 computer monitor:56 - 75 Hz
  • Viewable size, horizontal
    • 216V6LSB2/93 computer monitor:45.8 cm
    • 222I6LSB2/93 computer monitor:47.7 cm
  • Viewable size, vertical
    • 216V6LSB2/93 computer monitor:25.8 cm
    • 222I6LSB2/93 computer monitor:26.8 cm
  • LED indicators
    • 216V6LSB2/93 computer monitor:Operation, Stand-by
    • 222I6LSB2/93 computer monitor:Power
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • 216V6LSB2/93 computer monitor:27.03 W
    • 222I6LSB2/93 computer monitor:20 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 216V6LSB2/93, 222I6LSB2/93
81 specifications
Display6 differ
Display diagonalDiffers52.6 cm (20.7")54.6 cm (21.5")
Display brightness (typical)Differs200 cd/m²220 cd/m²
Pixel pitchDiffers0.2385 x 0.2385 mm0.248 x 0.248 mm
Vertical scan rangeDiffers56 - 76 Hz56 - 75 Hz
Viewable size, horizontalDiffers45.8 cm47.7 cm
Viewable size, verticalDiffers25.8 cm26.8 cm
Supported graphics resolutionsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Multimediaidentical
Built-in speaker(s)Known for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomics2 differ
On Screen Display (OSD) languagesDiffersSimplified Chinese, Traditional Chinese, Czech, German, Dutch, English, Spanish, Finnish, French, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Swedish, Turkish, UkrainianSimplified Chinese, Traditional Chinese, Czech, German, Dutch, English, Spanish, Finnish, French, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Portuguese, Russian, Swedish, Turkish, Ukrainian
LED indicatorsDiffersOperation, Stand-byPower
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs27.03 W20 W
Weight & dimensions7 differ
Width (with stand)Differs488 mm510 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs200 mm207 mm
Height (with stand)Differs365 mm389 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs2.1 kg2.82 kg
Width (without stand)Differs488 mm510 mm
Height (without stand)Differs295 mm313 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs1.82 kg2.61 kg
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers560 mm550 mm
Package depthDiffers110 mm109 mm
Package heightDiffers427 mm378 mm
Package weightDiffers3.27 kg2 g
Sustainability1 differ
Sustainability certificatesDiffersEPEAT Silver, ENERGY STARENERGY STAR
Other features1 differ
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Differs50000 h30000 h
CertificationKnown for oneCCC, CEL, RoHSUnknown — not stated by the source
Compliance industry standardsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceRoHS

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons