All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 monitors

Philips 200V4QSBR/11 computer monitor vs Philips 276E7QDSB/11 computer monitor

Add a product
  • 82specifications compared
  • 33differ
  • 49identical
  • 12known for one product only

Key differences

  • Display diagonal
    • 49.6 cm (19.5")
    • 68.6 cm (27")
  • Panel type
    • MVA
    • IPS
  • Response time
    • 20 ms
    • 5 ms
  • Contrast ratio (typical)
    • 3000:1
    • 1000:1
  • Contrast ratio (dynamic)
    • 10000000:1
    • 20000000:1
  • Pixel pitch
    • 0.23 x 0.22 mm
    • 0.311 x 0.311 mm
  • Viewable size, horizontal
    • 43.5 cm
    • 59.8 cm
  • Viewable size, vertical
    • 23.9 cm
    • 33.6 cm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
94 specifications
A

Philips

200V4QSBR/11 computer monitor

Model 200V4QSBR/11

View product
B

Philips

276E7QDSB/11 computer monitor

Model 276E7QDSB/11

View product
Display11 differ
Display diagonalDiffers49.6 cm (19.5")68.6 cm (27")
Panel typeDiffersMVAIPS
Response timeDiffers20 ms5 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs3000:11000:1
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Differs10000000:120000000:1
Pixel pitchDiffers0.23 x 0.22 mm0.311 x 0.311 mm
Viewable size, horizontalDiffers43.5 cm59.8 cm
Viewable size, verticalDiffers23.9 cm33.6 cm
Display diagonal (metric)Differs49.6 cm68.6 cm
Colour gamut standardDifferssRGBsRGB, NTSC
Colour gamutKnown for one104.4%
NTSC coverage (typical)Known for one104.4%
Display panel sizeDiffers19.53 inch / 49.6cm27 inch / 68.6 cm
Display surfaceKnown for oneGloss
SmartResponseKnown for one8 ms
Sync-on-green (SOG)Known for oneYes
Performanceidentical
Flicker-free technologyKnown for oneYes
Ports & interfacesidentical
HDMI ports quantityKnown for one1
HDCPKnown for oneYes
Mobile High-Definition Link (MHL)Known for oneYes
Ergonomicsidentical
LED indicatorsKnown for oneYes
Power3 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs13.97 W17.03 W
Power consumption (off)Differs0.5 W0.3 W
Power supply typeDiffersInternalExternal
Weight & dimensions8 differ
Width (with stand)Differs479 mm616 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs213 mm179 mm
Height (with stand)Differs369 mm468 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs2.72 kg4.33 kg
Width (without stand)Differs479 mm616 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs50 mm52 mm
Height (without stand)Differs299 mm370 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs2.39 kg4.08 kg
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers535 mm676 mm
Package depthDiffers131 mm113 mm
Package heightDiffers389 mm544 mm
Package weightDiffers3.79 kg6.81 kg
Other features7 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffersMac OS X; Windows 7; Windows 8.1Mac OS X; Windows 10 / 8.1 / 8 / 7
Exterior finish typeDiffersGloss/TexturedGloss
LowBlue modeKnown for oneYes
Signal inputDiffersVGA (Analog ); DVI-D (digital, HDCP)VGA (Analog ); DVI-D (digital, HDCP); MHL-HDMI (digital, HDCP)
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Differs30000 h50000 h
Compliance industry standardsDiffersWEEE, CCC, CE mark, CECP, CEL, China RoHS, CU, EPA, ETL, FCC Class B, PSB, TCO Certification, TUV / ISO 9241-307, UKRAINIAN, VCCICE mark, FCC Class B, CU-EAC, TCO Certification, TUV / ISO 9241-307, VCCI, RCM, WEEE, CECP
Picture enhancementKnown for oneSmartImage Lite
Regulatory ApprovalsDiffersWEEE; CCC; CE Mark; CECP; CEL; China RoHS; CU; EPA; ETL; FCC Class B; PSB; TCO Certified; TUV/ISO9241-307; UKRAINIAN; VCCICE Mark; FCC Class B; CU-EAC; TCO Certified; TUV/ISO9241-307; VCCI; RCM; WEEE; CECP
User controlsDiffersAuto/Down; 4:3 Wide/Up; Brightness/Back; Menu/OK; Power On/OffPower On/Off; Menu; Volume (HDMI Audio out); Input; SmartImage lite

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons