Product comparison · 2 monitors

Philips 200V4QSB/93 computer monitor vs Philips 273V5QSB/93 computer monitor

Add a product
  • 79specifications compared
  • 23differ
  • 56identical
  • 5known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips 273V5QSB/93 computer monitor has 50 cd/m² more display brightness (typical) than the Philips 200V4QSB/93 computer monitor (300 cd/m² vs 250 cd/m²). The Philips 200V4QSB/93 computer monitor has 8 ms more response time than the Philips 273V5QSB/93 computer monitor (20 ms vs 12 ms). The Philips 273V5QSB/93 computer monitor has 16.3 cm more viewable size, horizontal than the Philips 200V4QSB/93 computer monitor (59.8 cm vs 43.5 cm). Display diagonal: 49.6 cm (19.5") on the Philips 200V4QSB/93 computer monitor, 68.6 cm (27") on the Philips 273V5QSB/93 computer monitor. Panel type: MVA on the Philips 200V4QSB/93 computer monitor, A-MVA on the Philips 273V5QSB/93 computer monitor.

  • Display diagonal
    • 200V4QSB/93 computer monitor:49.6 cm (19.5")
    • 273V5QSB/93 computer monitor:68.6 cm (27")
  • Panel type
    • 200V4QSB/93 computer monitor:MVA
    • 273V5QSB/93 computer monitor:A-MVA
  • Display brightness (typical)
    • 200V4QSB/93 computer monitor:250 cd/m²
    • 273V5QSB/93 computer monitor:300 cd/m²
  • Response time
    • 200V4QSB/93 computer monitor:20 ms
    • 273V5QSB/93 computer monitor:12 ms
  • Pixel pitch
    • 200V4QSB/93 computer monitor:0.23 x 0.22 mm
    • 273V5QSB/93 computer monitor:0.311 x 0.311 mm
  • Viewable size, horizontal
    • 200V4QSB/93 computer monitor:43.5 cm
    • 273V5QSB/93 computer monitor:59.8 cm
  • Viewable size, vertical
    • 200V4QSB/93 computer monitor:23.9 cm
    • 273V5QSB/93 computer monitor:33.6 cm
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • 200V4QSB/93 computer monitor:15.22 W
    • 273V5QSB/93 computer monitor:24.56 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 200V4QSB/93, 273V5QSB/93
84 specifications
Display7 differ
Display diagonalDiffers49.6 cm (19.5")68.6 cm (27")
Panel typeDiffersMVAA-MVA
Display brightness (typical)Differs250 cd/m²300 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers20 ms12 ms
Pixel pitchDiffers0.23 x 0.22 mm0.311 x 0.311 mm
Viewable size, horizontalDiffers43.5 cm59.8 cm
Viewable size, verticalDiffers23.9 cm33.6 cm
Backlight typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceW-LED
Multimediaidentical
Built-in speaker(s)Known for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomics1 differ
On Screen Display (OSD) languagesDiffersSimplified Chinese, Traditional Chinese, Czech, German, Dutch, English, Spanish, Finnish, French, Hungarian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Swedish, Turkish, UkrainianSimplified Chinese, Czech, German, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Japanese, Korean, Polish, Portuguese, Russian, Turkish, Ukrainian
Number of OSD languagesKnown for one22Unknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs15.22 W24.56 W
Weight & dimensions8 differ
Width (with stand)Differs479 mm646 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs201 mm240 mm
Height (with stand)Differs369 mm471 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs2.72 kg4.53 kg
Width (without stand)Differs479 mm646 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs48 mm57 mm
Height (without stand)Differs299 mm398 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs2.39 kg4 kg
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers535 mm708 mm
Package depthDiffers131 mm149 mm
Package heightDiffers389 mm482 mm
Package weightDiffers3.83 kg6.4 kg
Sustainability1 differ
Sustainability certificatesDiffersEPEAT Silver, ENERGY STAREPEAT Gold, ENERGY STAR
Other features1 differ
CertificationDiffersWEEE, CCC, CE Mark, CECP, CEL, China RoHS, CU, EPA, ETL, FCC Class B, PSB, TCO certified, TUV/ISO9241-307,UKRAINIANCCC, WEEE
On/off switchKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Thin Clientidentical
Thin client installedKnown for oneNoUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons