Product comparison · 2 monitors

Philips S Line 200S5QSB/93 computer monitor vs Philips S Line 243S7QDSBF/93 computer monitor

Add a product
  • 90specifications compared
  • 33differ
  • 57identical
  • 11known for one product only

Key differences

  • Display diagonal
    • S Line 200S5QSB/93 computer monitor:49.6 cm (19.5")
    • S Line 243S7QDSBF/93 computer monitor:60.5 cm (23.8")
  • Panel type
    • S Line 200S5QSB/93 computer monitor:MVA
    • S Line 243S7QDSBF/93 computer monitor:IPS
  • Response time
    • S Line 200S5QSB/93 computer monitor:8 ms
    • S Line 243S7QDSBF/93 computer monitor:5 ms
  • Contrast ratio (typical)
    • S Line 200S5QSB/93 computer monitor:3000:1
    • S Line 243S7QDSBF/93 computer monitor:1000:1
  • Pixel pitch
    • S Line 200S5QSB/93 computer monitor:0.23 x 0.22 mm
    • S Line 243S7QDSBF/93 computer monitor:0.275 x 0.275 mm
  • Pixel density
    • S Line 200S5QSB/93 computer monitor:113 ppi
    • S Line 243S7QDSBF/93 computer monitor:93 ppi
  • Viewable size, horizontal
    • S Line 200S5QSB/93 computer monitor:43.5 cm
    • S Line 243S7QDSBF/93 computer monitor:52.7 cm
  • Viewable size, vertical
    • S Line 200S5QSB/93 computer monitor:23.9 cm
    • S Line 243S7QDSBF/93 computer monitor:29.6 cm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 200S5QSB/93, 243S7QDSBF/93
101 specifications
Display10 differ
Display diagonalDiffers49.6 cm (19.5")60.5 cm (23.8")
Panel typeDiffersMVAIPS
Response timeDiffers8 ms5 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs3000:11000:1
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source10000000:1
Pixel pitchDiffers0.23 x 0.22 mm0.275 x 0.275 mm
Pixel densityDiffers113 ppi93 ppi
Viewable size, horizontalDiffers43.5 cm52.7 cm
Viewable size, verticalDiffers23.9 cm29.6 cm
Display diagonal (metric)Differs49.6 cm60.5 cm
Display panel sizeDiffers19.53 inch / 49.6cm23.8 inch / 60.5 cm
Anti-glare screenKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Aspect ratioKnown for one4:3, 16:9Unknown — not stated by the source
Haze rateKnown for one25%Unknown — not stated by the source
Surface hardnessKnown for one3HUnknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Flicker-free technologyKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Ports & interfaces4 differ
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityDiffers01
DVI portDiffersNoYes
DVI-D ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
HDMIDiffersNoYes
HDMI ports quantityDiffers01
DisplayPorts quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs14.01 W13.82 W
Weight & dimensions8 differ
Width (with stand)Differs479 mm540 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs213 mm209 mm
Height (with stand)Differs369 mm415 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs2.72 kg3.5 kg
Width (without stand)Differs479 mm540 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs50 mm45 mm
Height (without stand)Differs299 mm325 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs2.39 kg3.1 kg
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers535 mm602 mm
Package depthDiffers131 mm128 mm
Package heightDiffers389 mm472 mm
Package weightDiffers3.9 kg5.09 kg
Sustainability1 differ
Sustainability certificatesDiffersEPEAT Silver, ENERGY STAREPEAT Gold, ENERGY STAR
Other features5 differ
Exterior finish typeDiffersGloss/TexturedTextured
EasyRead modeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
LowBlue modeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Signal inputDiffersVGA (Analog ); DVI-D (digital, HDCP)VGA (Analog ); DVI-D (digital, HDCP); HDMI (digital, HDCP)
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Differs70000 h50000 h
Regulatory ApprovalsDiffersWEEE; CCC; China RoHSWEEE; CECP; CCC; TUV Cert. - blue light cut-off
User controlsDiffersAuto/Down; 4:3 Wide/Up; Brightness/Back; Menu/OK; Power On/OffSmartImage; Input; Brightness; Menu; Power On/Off
Packaging contentidentical
Bundled softwareKnown for oneSmartControlUnknown — not stated by the source

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons