All categories
Phones & WearablesView all 31

Departments

Phones & WearablesComputers & TabletsComponents & StorageNetworkingPrinting & OfficePower & ChargingTV, Audio & VideoGaming, Toys & RobotsKitchen AppliancesHome AppliancesPersonal Care & HealthSmart Home & SecurityCar & MobilityTools & GardenCameras & Photo

Shopping country

Browse

All categoriesCompare products

Product comparison · 2 monitors

Philips 193V5LSB2/69 computer monitor vs Philips 216V6LHSB2/00 computer monitor

Add a product
  • 89specifications compared
  • 35differ
  • 54identical
  • 11known for one product only

Key differences

  • Display diagonal
    • 47 cm (18.5")
    • 52.6 cm (20.7")
  • Display resolution
    • 1366 x 768 pixels
    • 1920 x 1080 pixels
  • HD type
    • WXGA
    • Full HD
  • Contrast ratio (typical)
    • 700:1
    • 600:1
  • Pixel pitch
    • 0.3 x 0.3 mm
    • 0.2385 x 0.2385 mm
  • Vertical scan range
    • 56 - 75 Hz
    • 56 - 76 Hz
  • Viewable size, horizontal
    • 41 cm
    • 45.8 cm
  • Viewable size, vertical
    • 23 cm
    • 25.8 cm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only
100 specifications
A

Philips

193V5LSB2/69 computer monitor

Model 193V5LSB2/69

View product
B

Philips

216V6LHSB2/00 computer monitor

Model 216V6LHSB2/00

View product
Display10 differ
Display diagonalDiffers47 cm (18.5")52.6 cm (20.7")
Display resolutionDiffers1366 x 768 pixels1920 x 1080 pixels
HD typeDiffersWXGAFull HD
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs700:1600:1
Maximum refresh rateKnown for one60 Hz
Pixel pitchDiffers0.3 x 0.3 mm0.2385 x 0.2385 mm
Vertical scan rangeDiffers56 - 75 Hz56 - 76 Hz
Viewable size, horizontalDiffers41 cm45.8 cm
Viewable size, verticalDiffers23 cm25.8 cm
Display diagonal (metric)Differs47 cm52.6 cm
Display panel sizeDiffers18.5 inch / 47 cm20.7 inch / 52.6 cm
Supported graphics resolutionsKnown for one1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Performanceidentical
Component video syncKnown for oneSeparate Sync
Ports & interfaces1 differ
HDMI ports quantityDiffers01
HDCPKnown for oneYes
Ergonomics1 differ
Tilt angle rangeDiffers-3 - 10°-5 - 20°
Height adjustmentKnown for oneNo
Power2 differ
Energy efficiency class (SDR)Known for oneE
Power consumption (typical)Differs8.76 W24.87 W
Power supply typeDiffersInternalExternal
Power consumption (max)Known for one28.59 W
Weight & dimensions8 differ
Width (with stand)Differs437 mm488 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs170 mm200 mm
Height (with stand)Differs338 mm365 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs2.15 kg2.1 kg
Width (without stand)Differs437 mm488 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs48 mm39 mm
Height (without stand)Differs273 mm295 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs1.94 kg1.82 kg
Packaging data4 differ
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Known for one481 x 350 x 103 mm
Package widthDiffers481 mm560 mm
Package depthDiffers103 mm110 mm
Package heightDiffers350 mm427 mm
Package weightDiffers3 kg3.27 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneVGA, AC
Sustainability1 differ
Sustainability certificatesDiffersEPEAT Silver, ENERGY STAREPEAT Silver
Other features8 differ
Compatible operating systemsDiffersMac OS X; Windows 7; Windows 8Mac OS X; Windows 10 / 8.1 / 8 / 7
Exterior finish typeKnown for oneHairline/Textured
Heavy metals freeDiffersHg (mercury)Hg (mercury), Pb (lead)
Monitor sync input signalDiffersSeparate SyncSeparate Sync; Sync on Green
Signal inputDiffersVGA (Analog )VGA (Analog ); HDMI (digital, HDCP)
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Differs30000 h50000 h
CertificationDiffersRoHS, BSMI, CCC, CE Mark, cETLus, FCC Class B, GOST, PSB, SASO, SEMKO, TUV/ISO9241-307, WEEECEL, WEEE, CB, CCC, CE Mark, RoHS
Regulatory ApprovalsDiffersBSMI; CE Mark; cETLus; FCC Class B; GOST; PSB; SASO; SEMKO; TUV/ISO9241-307; WEEECEL; WEEE; CB; CCC; CE Mark
User controlsDiffersPower On/OffPower On/Off; Menu/OK; Brightness/Back; 4:3 Wide/Up; Auto/Down
Recycling dataidentical
Overall recyclability rateKnown for one100%

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons