Product comparison · 2 monitors

Philips 190V9FB/93 computer monitor vs Philips 190VW9FB/78 computer monitor

Add a product
  • 78specifications compared
  • 25differ
  • 53identical
  • 8known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips 190VW9FB/78 computer monitor has 25 MHz more pixel frequency than the Philips 190V9FB/93 computer monitor (165 MHz vs 140 MHz). The Philips 190V9FB/93 computer monitor has 1 W more power consumption (typical) than the Philips 190VW9FB/78 computer monitor (36 W vs 35 W). The Philips 190VW9FB/78 computer monitor has 29.9 mm more width (with stand) than the Philips 190V9FB/93 computer monitor (439 mm vs 409.1 mm). Display resolution: 1280 x 1024 pixels on the Philips 190V9FB/93 computer monitor, 1440 x 900 pixels on the Philips 190VW9FB/78 computer monitor. HD type: SXGA on the Philips 190V9FB/93 computer monitor, WXGA+ on the Philips 190VW9FB/78 computer monitor.

  • Display resolution
    • 190V9FB/93 computer monitor:1280 x 1024 pixels
    • 190VW9FB/78 computer monitor:1440 x 900 pixels
  • HD type
    • 190V9FB/93 computer monitor:SXGA
    • 190VW9FB/78 computer monitor:WXGA+
  • Supported graphics resolutions
    • 190V9FB/93 computer monitor:1280 x 1024 (SXGA)
    • 190VW9FB/78 computer monitor:1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
  • Pixel pitch
    • 190V9FB/93 computer monitor:0.294 x 0.294 mm
    • 190VW9FB/78 computer monitor:0.285 x 0.285 mm
  • Pixel frequency
    • 190V9FB/93 computer monitor:140 MHz
    • 190VW9FB/78 computer monitor:165 MHz
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • 190V9FB/93 computer monitor:36 W
    • 190VW9FB/78 computer monitor:35 W
  • Width (with stand)
    • 190V9FB/93 computer monitor:409.1 mm
    • 190VW9FB/78 computer monitor:439 mm
  • Depth (with stand)
    • 190V9FB/93 computer monitor:204.9 mm
    • 190VW9FB/78 computer monitor:191.7 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 190V9FB/93, 190VW9FB/78
86 specifications
Display5 differ
Display resolutionDiffers1280 x 1024 pixels1440 x 900 pixels
HD typeDiffersSXGAWXGA+
Supported graphics resolutionsDiffers1280 x 1024 (SXGA)1440 x 900 (WXGA+)
Pixel pitchDiffers0.294 x 0.294 mm0.285 x 0.285 mm
Pixel frequencyDiffers140 MHz165 MHz
Native aspect ratioKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source16:10
Panel typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceTFT
Aspect ratioKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source16:10
Performanceidentical
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs36 W35 W
Weight & dimensions7 differ
Width (with stand)Differs409.1 mm439 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs204.9 mm191.7 mm
Height (with stand)Differs406.8 mm363.1 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs3.78 kg3600, 3.6
Width (without stand)Differs409.1 mm439 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs58.9 mm60.9 mm
Height (without stand)Differs351.9 mm304 mm
Packaging data4 differ
Package widthDiffers451 mm375 mm
Package depthDiffers139 mm490 mm
Package heightDiffers490 mm145 mm
Package weightDiffers5.27 kg4.95 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Cables includedKnown for oneAC, VGAUnknown — not stated by the source
ManualKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Other features8 differ
Display viewable area (HxV)Differs376.3 x 301.1 mm408.24 x 255.15 mm
Effective viewing areaDiffers376.3 x 301.1 mm408.24 x 255.15 mm
CertificationKnown for oneCCC CE mark FCC Class B UL/cULUnknown — not stated by the source
Box height (imperial)Differs14 cm (5.5")14.5 cm (5.7")
Set depth (inch)Differs5.84 cm (2.3")6.1 cm (2.4")
Set depth (with stand) (inch)Differs20.6 cm (8.1")19.3 cm (7.6")
Set height (inch)Differs35.3 cm (13.9")30.5 cm (12")
Set height (with stand) (inch)Differs40.6 cm (16")36.3 cm (14.3")
Weight (with stand) (imperial)Differs3.76 kg (8.3 lbs)3.58 kg (7.9 lbs)
Regulatory ApprovalsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCE Mark, FCC Class B, UL/cUL

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons