Product comparison · 2 monitors

Philips LCD monitor with LED backlight 190V3LSB5/10 vs Philips LCD monitor 190V3SB5/10

74specifications compared
4differ
70identical
0known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips LCD monitor 190V3SB5/10 has 4.2 W more power consumption (typical) than the Philips LCD monitor with LED backlight 190V3LSB5/10 (19.3 W vs 15.1 W). The Philips LCD monitor 190V3SB5/10 has 20,000 h more mean time between failures (MTBF) than the Philips LCD monitor with LED backlight 190V3LSB5/10 (50000 h vs 30000 h). Backlight type: W-LED on the Philips LCD monitor with LED backlight 190V3LSB5/10, CCFL on the Philips LCD monitor 190V3SB5/10. Heavy metals free: Hg (mercury), Pb (lead) on the Philips LCD monitor with LED backlight 190V3LSB5/10, Pb (lead) on the Philips LCD monitor 190V3SB5/10.

Backlight type
- LCD monitor with LED backlight 190V3LSB5/10:W-LED
- LCD monitor 190V3SB5/10:CCFL
Power consumption (typical)
- LCD monitor with LED backlight 190V3LSB5/10:15.1 W
- LCD monitor 190V3SB5/10:19.3 W
Heavy metals free
- LCD monitor with LED backlight 190V3LSB5/10:Hg (mercury), Pb (lead)
- LCD monitor 190V3SB5/10:Pb (lead)
Mean time between failures (MTBF)
- LCD monitor with LED backlight 190V3LSB5/10:30000 h
- LCD monitor 190V3SB5/10:50000 h

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 190V3LSB5/10, 190V3SB5/10
74 specifications	A Philips LCD monitor with LED backlight 190V3LSB5/10 Model 190V3LSB5/10 View product	B Philips LCD monitor 190V3SB5/10 Model 190V3SB5/10 View product
Display1 differ
Backlight typeDiffers	W-LED	CCFL
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	15.1 W	19.3 W
Other features2 differ
Heavy metals freeDiffers	Hg (mercury), Pb (lead)	Pb (lead)
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Differs	30000 h	50000 h

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons