Product comparison · 2 monitors

Philips Brilliance 190CW9FB/00 computer monitor vs Philips Brilliance LCD widescreen monitor 220SW9FB/00

37specifications compared
19differ
18identical
11known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- Brilliance 190CW9FB/00 computer monitor:48.3 cm (19")
- Brilliance LCD widescreen monitor 220SW9FB/00:55.9 cm (22")
Display resolution
- Brilliance 190CW9FB/00 computer monitor:1440 x 900 pixels
- Brilliance LCD widescreen monitor 220SW9FB/00:1680 x 1050 pixels
Contrast ratio (dynamic)
- Brilliance 190CW9FB/00 computer monitor:12000:1
- Brilliance LCD widescreen monitor 220SW9FB/00:10000:1
Viewing angle, horizontal
- Brilliance 190CW9FB/00 computer monitor:176°
- Brilliance LCD widescreen monitor 220SW9FB/00:160°
Viewing angle, vertical
- Brilliance 190CW9FB/00 computer monitor:170°
- Brilliance LCD widescreen monitor 220SW9FB/00:160°
Pixel pitch
- Brilliance 190CW9FB/00 computer monitor:0.285 x 0.285 mm
- Brilliance LCD widescreen monitor 220SW9FB/00:0.282 x 0.282 mm
Windows operating systems supported
- Brilliance 190CW9FB/00 computer monitor:Windows 2000
- Brilliance LCD widescreen monitor 220SW9FB/00:Windows 98, Windows 2000
Power consumption (typical)
- Brilliance 190CW9FB/00 computer monitor:36 W
- Brilliance LCD widescreen monitor 220SW9FB/00:34 W

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 190CW9FB/00, 220SW9FB/00
48 specifications	A Philips Brilliance 190CW9FB/00 computer monitor Model 190CW9FB/00 View product	B Philips Brilliance LCD widescreen monitor 220SW9FB/00 Model 220SW9FB/00 View product
Display6 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	48.3 cm (19")	55.9 cm (22")
Display resolutionDiffers	1440 x 900 pixels	1680 x 1050 pixels
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Differs	12000:1	10000:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	176°	160°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	170°	160°
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.285 x 0.285 mm	0.282 x 0.282 mm
Pixel frequencyKnown for one	165 MHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Performance1 differ
Windows operating systems supportedDiffers	Windows 2000	Windows 98, Windows 2000
Ports & interfacesidentical
USB hub versionKnown for one	2.0	Unknown — not stated by the source
USB Type-A downstream ports quantityKnown for one	1	Unknown — not stated by the source
DVI-D ports quantityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	1
Ergonomicsidentical
Cable lock slotKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Cable lock slot typeKnown for one	Kensington	Unknown — not stated by the source
LED indicatorsKnown for one	Stand-by	Unknown — not stated by the source
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 x 100 mm
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	36 W	34 W
Operational conditionsidentical
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	-20 - 60 °C	Unknown — not stated by the source
Relative humidityKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	20 - 80%
Weight & dimensions7 differ
Width (with stand)Differs	443 mm	502 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs	170 mm	199 mm
Height (with stand)Differs	368 mm	413 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs	4 kg	4.3 kg
Width (without stand)Differs	443 mm	502 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	65 mm	58 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	299 mm	346 mm
Other features4 differ
Display viewable area (HxV)Differs	410.4 x 256.5 mm	474 x 296 mm
Power requirementsDiffers	100-240VAC, 50/60Hz	100 - 240VAC, 50/60Hz
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Known for one	50000 h	Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationDiffers	CE Mark, Energy Star, FCC Class B, SEMKO, UL/cUL, TCO '06	CE Mark, FCC Class B, SEMKO, TCO '03, TÜV/GS, TÜV Ergo, UL/cUL
Supplied AC adapter typeDiffers	LCD	AC

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons