Product comparison · 2 monitors

Philips 19 inch LCD monitor 190X5FB/20 vs Viewsonic 19IN LCD TFT 1280X1024

Add a product
  • 17specifications compared
  • 8differ
  • 9identical
  • 12known for one product only

Key differences

The Viewsonic 19IN LCD TFT 1280X1024 has 150 cd/m² more display brightness (typical) than the Philips 19 inch LCD monitor 190X5FB/20 (400 cd/m² vs 250 cd/m²). The Philips 19 inch LCD monitor 190X5FB/20 has 50 :1 more contrast ratio (typical) than the Viewsonic 19IN LCD TFT 1280X1024 (500:1 vs 450:1). The Philips 19 inch LCD monitor 190X5FB/20 has 27.8 mm more width (without stand) than the Viewsonic 19IN LCD TFT 1280X1024 (443.8 mm vs 416 mm). Vertical scan range: 56 - 76 Hz on the Philips 19 inch LCD monitor 190X5FB/20, 50 - 85 Hz on the Viewsonic 19IN LCD TFT 1280X1024.

  • Display brightness (typical)
    • 19 inch LCD monitor 190X5FB/20:250 cd/m²
    • 19IN LCD TFT 1280X1024:400 cd/m²
  • Contrast ratio (typical)
    • 19 inch LCD monitor 190X5FB/20:500:1
    • 19IN LCD TFT 1280X1024:450:1
  • Vertical scan range
    • 19 inch LCD monitor 190X5FB/20:56 - 76 Hz
    • 19IN LCD TFT 1280X1024:50 - 85 Hz
  • Width (without stand)
    • 19 inch LCD monitor 190X5FB/20:443.8 mm
    • 19IN LCD TFT 1280X1024:416 mm
  • Depth (without stand)
    • 19 inch LCD monitor 190X5FB/20:181.4 mm
    • 19IN LCD TFT 1280X1024:460 mm
  • Height (without stand)
    • 19 inch LCD monitor 190X5FB/20:436.3 mm
    • 19IN LCD TFT 1280X1024:238 mm
  • Weight (without stand)
    • 19 inch LCD monitor 190X5FB/20:7.2 kg
    • 19IN LCD TFT 1280X1024:7.5 kg

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of 19 inch LCD monitor 190X5FB/20, 19IN LCD TFT 1280X1024
29 specifications
Display3 differ
Display diagonal48.3 cm (19")48.3 cm (19")
Display resolution1280 x 1024 pixels1280 x 1024 pixels
TouchscreenNoNo
Display brightness (typical)Differs250 cd/m²400 cd/m²
Response time12 ms12 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs500:1450:1
Viewing angle, horizontal160°160°
Viewing angle, vertical160°160°
Pixel pitchKnown for one0.294 x 0.294 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Horizontal scan range30 - 82 kHz30 - 82 kHz
Vertical scan rangeDiffers56 - 76 Hz50 - 85 Hz
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for one37.6 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size, verticalKnown for one30.1 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Designidentical
Product colourKnown for oneBlackUnknown — not stated by the source
Market positioningKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceBusiness
Ergonomicsidentical
Tilt angle rangeKnown for one-5 - 20°Unknown — not stated by the source
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)35 W35 W
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Width (without stand)Differs443.8 mm416 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs181.4 mm460 mm
Height (without stand)Differs436.3 mm238 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs7.2 kg7.5 kg
Other features1 differ
Security featuresKnown for oneKensington lockUnknown — not stated by the source
CertificationDiffersCE Mark, E2000, FCC-B, UL, CSA, MPR-II, low emission, SEMKO, GOST, Energy Star, TÜV-ErgoUL, cUL, FCC_B, CB, CE, ENERGY NOM, TUV/GS, TUV Ergo, (covers ISO13406-2 and MPR II), TCO’99, NEMKO, SEMKO, DEMKO, FIMKO, GOSTR, hygienic, SASO, PCBC, VCCI, BSMI, CCC, PSB, C-TICK, TUV-S
Supplied AC adapter typeLCDLCD
CompatibilityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourcePC( VGA up to 1280x1024 non-interlaced 0 / Mac ( Power Mac G3/G4/G5 up to 1280x1024 ).
Power requirementsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAC 100–240V (universal), 50–60Hz
Power managementKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceMeets TCO and ENERGY STAR standards
Ports & interfacesidentical
I/O portsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAnalog 15-pin mini D-sub x2. Digital DVI-D. Power 3-pin plug.
Operational conditionsidentical
Maximum operating temperature range (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0 - 40 °C

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons