Product comparison · 2 monitors

Philips 170V9FB/62 computer monitor vs Philips 190VW9FB/62 computer monitor

Add a product
  • 36specifications compared
  • 11differ
  • 25identical
  • 11known for one product only

Key differences

  • Display diagonal
    • 170V9FB/62 computer monitor:43.2 cm (17")
    • 190VW9FB/62 computer monitor:48.5 cm (19.1")
  • Display resolution
    • 170V9FB/62 computer monitor:1280 x 1024 pixels
    • 190VW9FB/62 computer monitor:1440 x 900 pixels
  • Pixel pitch
    • 170V9FB/62 computer monitor:0.264 x 0.264 mm
    • 190VW9FB/62 computer monitor:0.285 x 0.285 mm
  • Power consumption (typical)
    • 170V9FB/62 computer monitor:36 W
    • 190VW9FB/62 computer monitor:35 W
  • Width (with stand)
    • 170V9FB/62 computer monitor:370.8 mm
    • 190VW9FB/62 computer monitor:439.4 mm
  • Width (without stand)
    • 170V9FB/62 computer monitor:370.8 mm
    • 190VW9FB/62 computer monitor:439.4 mm
  • Display viewable area (HxV)
    • 170V9FB/62 computer monitor:337.9 x 270.3 mm
    • 190VW9FB/62 computer monitor:408.24 x 255.15 mm
  • Effective viewing area
    • 170V9FB/62 computer monitor:337.9 x 270.3 mm
    • 190VW9FB/62 computer monitor:408.24 x 255.15 mm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of 170V9FB/62, 190VW9FB/62
47 specifications
Display3 differ
Display diagonalDiffers43.2 cm (17")48.5 cm (19.1")
Display resolutionDiffers1280 x 1024 pixels1440 x 900 pixels
Native aspect ratioKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source16:10
TouchscreenNoNo
Display brightness (typical)300 cd/m²300 cd/m²
Response time5 ms5 ms
Aspect ratioKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source16:10
Contrast ratio (typical)800:1800:1
Viewing angle, horizontal160°160°
Viewing angle, vertical160°160°
Pixel pitchDiffers0.264 x 0.264 mm0.285 x 0.285 mm
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 - 83 kHz
Vertical scan rangeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source56 - 75 Hz
Video input impedance75 Ω75 Ω
Video input signal levelsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source0.7 Vpp
Pixel frequencyKnown for one140 MHzUnknown — not stated by the source
Performanceidentical
Windows operating systems supportedWindows 98, Windows 2000Windows 98, Windows 2000
Multimediaidentical
Built-in speaker(s)NoNo
Built-in cameraNoNo
Designidentical
Product colourBlackBlack
Ports & interfacesidentical
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantity11
Ergonomicsidentical
Panel mounting interface100 x 100 mm100 x 100 mm
Cable lock slotYesYes
Cable lock slot typeKensingtonKensington
Tilt angle range-5 - 20°-5 - 20°
Plug and PlayYesYes
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs36 W35 W
Power consumption (off)1 W1 W
Operational conditionsidentical
Operating temperature (T-T)0 - 40 °C0 - 40 °C
Storage temperature (T-T)-20 - 60 °C-20 - 60 °C
Relative humidity20 - 80%20 - 80%
Weight & dimensions2 differ
Width (with stand)Differs370.8 mm439.4 mm
Width (without stand)Differs370.8 mm439.4 mm
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesENERGY STARENERGY STAR
Other features5 differ
TV tuner integratedNoNo
Display viewable area (HxV)Differs337.9 x 270.3 mm408.24 x 255.15 mm
Effective viewing areaDiffers337.9 x 270.3 mm408.24 x 255.15 mm
Power requirementsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100-240VAC, 50/60Hz
Signal inputVGAVGA
Mean time between failures (MTBF)50000 h50000 h
CertificationKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceCE Mark, Energy Star, FCC Class B, UL/cUL
Set depth (inch)Differs5.84 cm (2.3")6.1 cm (2.4")
Set depth (with stand) (inch)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source19.3 cm (7.6")
Set height (inch)Differs32.3 cm (12.7")30.5 cm (12")
Set height (with stand) (inch)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source36.3 cm (14.3")
Weight (with stand) (imperial)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source3.58 kg (7.9 lbs)
Supplied AC adapter typeDiffersAC1440 x 900

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons