Product comparison · 2 monitors

Philips 170B2Y 17" TFT .264 82kHz TCO95 Silver vs Philips 200P3M 20.1" TFT .255 1600x1200 TCO99

Add a product
  • 18specifications compared
  • 13differ
  • 5identical
  • 2known for one product only

Key differences

The Philips 170B2Y 17" TFT .264 82kHz TCO95 Silver has 100 :1 more contrast ratio (typical) than the Philips 200P3M 20.1" TFT .255 1600x1200 TCO99 (400:1 vs 300:1). The Philips 170B2Y 17" TFT .264 82kHz TCO95 Silver has 0.009 more pixel pitch than the Philips 200P3M 20.1" TFT .255 1600x1200 TCO99 (0.264 vs 0.255). The Philips 200P3M 20.1" TFT .255 1600x1200 TCO99 has 7 cm more viewable size, horizontal than the Philips 170B2Y 17" TFT .264 82kHz TCO95 Silver (40.8 cm vs 33.8 cm). Display diagonal: 43.2 cm (17") on the Philips 170B2Y 17" TFT .264 82kHz TCO95 Silver, 51 cm (20.1") on the Philips 200P3M 20.1" TFT .255 1600x1200 TCO99. Display resolution: 1280 x 1024 pixels on the Philips 170B2Y 17" TFT .264 82kHz TCO95 Silver, 1600 x 1200 pixels on the Philips 200P3M 20.1" TFT .255 1600x1200 TCO99.

  • Display diagonal
    • 170B2Y 17" TFT .264 82kHz TCO95 Silver:43.2 cm (17")
    • 200P3M 20.1" TFT .255 1600x1200 TCO99:51 cm (20.1")
  • Display resolution
    • 170B2Y 17" TFT .264 82kHz TCO95 Silver:1280 x 1024 pixels
    • 200P3M 20.1" TFT .255 1600x1200 TCO99:1600 x 1200 pixels
  • Contrast ratio (typical)
    • 170B2Y 17" TFT .264 82kHz TCO95 Silver:400:1
    • 200P3M 20.1" TFT .255 1600x1200 TCO99:300:1
  • Pixel pitch
    • 170B2Y 17" TFT .264 82kHz TCO95 Silver:0.264
    • 200P3M 20.1" TFT .255 1600x1200 TCO99:0.255
  • Horizontal scan range
    • 170B2Y 17" TFT .264 82kHz TCO95 Silver:30 - 82 kHz
    • 200P3M 20.1" TFT .255 1600x1200 TCO99:30 - 94 kHz
  • Vertical scan range
    • 170B2Y 17" TFT .264 82kHz TCO95 Silver:56 - 76 Hz
    • 200P3M 20.1" TFT .255 1600x1200 TCO99:56 - 85 Hz
  • Viewable size, horizontal
    • 170B2Y 17" TFT .264 82kHz TCO95 Silver:33.8 cm
    • 200P3M 20.1" TFT .255 1600x1200 TCO99:40.8 cm
  • Viewable size, vertical
    • 170B2Y 17" TFT .264 82kHz TCO95 Silver:27 cm
    • 200P3M 20.1" TFT .255 1600x1200 TCO99:30.6 cm

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 170B2Y 17" TFT .264 82kHz TCO95 Silver, 200P3M 20.1" TFT .255 1600x1200 TCO99
20 specifications
Display8 differ
Display diagonalDiffers43.2 cm (17")51 cm (20.1")
Display resolutionDiffers1280 x 1024 pixels1600 x 1200 pixels
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs400:1300:1
Pixel pitchDiffers0.2640.255
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers30 - 82 kHz30 - 94 kHz
Vertical scan rangeDiffers56 - 76 Hz56 - 85 Hz
Viewable size, horizontalDiffers33.8 cm40.8 cm
Viewable size, verticalDiffers27 cm30.6 cm
Response timeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source30 ms
Weight & dimensions3 differ
Width (without stand)Differs414 mm488 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs180 mm220 mm
Height (without stand)Differs406 mm459 mm
Packaging contentidentical
Bundled softwareKnown for oneDrivers & UtilitiesUnknown — not stated by the source
Other features2 differ
Audio systemDiffersNo2 x 2W RMS Stereo Front Firing
CertificationDiffersTUV/GS, TUV-Ergo, FCC-B, UL, CSA, SEMKO, MPR-II Low Emission, CE Mark, NUTEK, Energy Star, TCO’95TÜV/GS, TÜV-Ergo, FCC-B, UL, CSA, CE Mark, SEMKO, Energy Star, MPR-II Low Emission, TCO’99

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons