Product comparison · 2 monitors

Philips V Line 166V3LSB/93 computer monitor vs Philips Brilliance LCD monitor, LED backlight 231S4LSS/00

79specifications compared
38differ
41identical
24known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- V Line 166V3LSB/93 computer monitor:39.6 cm (15.6")
- Brilliance LCD monitor, LED backlight 231S4LSS/00:58.4 cm (23")
Display resolution
- V Line 166V3LSB/93 computer monitor:1366 x 768 pixels
- Brilliance LCD monitor, LED backlight 231S4LSS/00:1920 x 1080 pixels
Display technology
- V Line 166V3LSB/93 computer monitor:LED
- Brilliance LCD monitor, LED backlight 231S4LSS/00:LCD
Display brightness (typical)
- V Line 166V3LSB/93 computer monitor:200 cd/m²
- Brilliance LCD monitor, LED backlight 231S4LSS/00:250 cd/m²
Response time
- V Line 166V3LSB/93 computer monitor:8 ms
- Brilliance LCD monitor, LED backlight 231S4LSS/00:5 ms
Supported graphics resolutions
- V Line 166V3LSB/93 computer monitor:1366 x 768
- Brilliance LCD monitor, LED backlight 231S4LSS/00:1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Contrast ratio (typical)
- V Line 166V3LSB/93 computer monitor:500:1
- Brilliance LCD monitor, LED backlight 231S4LSS/00:1000:1
Contrast ratio (dynamic)
- V Line 166V3LSB/93 computer monitor:10000000:1
- Brilliance LCD monitor, LED backlight 231S4LSS/00:20000000:1

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of 166V3LSB/93, 231S4LSS/00
103 specifications	A Philips V Line 166V3LSB/93 computer monitor Model 166V3LSB/93 View product	B Philips Brilliance LCD monitor, LED backlight 231S4LSS/00 Model 231S4LSS/00 View product
Display12 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	39.6 cm (15.6")	58.4 cm (23")
Display resolutionDiffers	1366 x 768 pixels	1920 x 1080 pixels
Display technologyDiffers	LED	LCD
LED backlightKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display brightness (typical)Differs	200 cd/m²	250 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers	8 ms	5 ms
Display surfaceKnown for one	Gloss	Unknown — not stated by the source
Supported graphics resolutionsDiffers	1366 x 768	1920 x 1080 (HD 1080)
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs	500:1	1000:1
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Differs	10000000:1	20000000:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	90°	170°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	50°	160°
Display number of coloursDiffers	16.7 million colours	16.78 million colours
Pixel pitchDiffers	0.252 x 0.252 mm	0.265 x 0.265 mm
Viewable size, horizontalKnown for one	36 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Viewable size, verticalKnown for one	21 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display diagonal (metric)Known for one	39.6 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display sRGBKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display panel sizeKnown for one	15.6 inch / 39.6 cm	Unknown — not stated by the source
HD typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Full HD
Design1 differ
Product colourDiffers	Black	Silver
Ports & interfaces1 differ
Built-in USB hubDiffers	Yes	No
Ergonomics3 differ
VESA mountingDiffers	No	Yes
Height adjustmentKnown for one	No	Unknown — not stated by the source
On Screen Display (OSD) languagesDiffers	Portuguese, English, French, German, Italian, Russian, Simplified Chinese, Spanish, Turkish	Simplified Chinese, Dutch, English, Spanish, French, Italian, Portuguese, Russian
Number of OSD languagesDiffers	9	8
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 x 100 mm
Power3 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	7.5 W	21.3 W
Power consumption (standby)Differs	0.5 W	0.1 W
Power consumption (off)Differs	0.5 W	0.1 W
Power supply typeKnown for one	Internal	Unknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions9 differ
Dimensions (W x D x H) with standDiffers	392 x 318 x 174 mm	547 x 431 x 207 mm
Width (with stand)Differs	392 mm	547 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs	174 mm	207 mm
Height (with stand)Differs	318 mm	431 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs	1.66 kg	3.68 kg
Width (without stand)Differs	392 mm	547 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	44 mm	60 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	242 mm	343 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	1.41 kg	3.03 kg
Packaging data5 differ
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Differs	440 x 339 x 113 mm	589 x 478 x 139 mm
Package widthDiffers	432 mm	589 mm
Package depthDiffers	100 mm	139 mm
Package heightDiffers	337 mm	478 mm
Package weightDiffers	2.49 kg	5.84 kg
Sustainability1 differ
Sustainability certificatesDiffers	EPEAT Silver, ENERGY STAR	EPEAT Gold, ENERGY STAR
Doesn't containKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	PVC/BFR, Mercury, Lead
Other features2 differ
Compatible operating systemsKnown for one	Mac OS X; Windows 7	Unknown — not stated by the source
Exterior finish typeKnown for one	Gloss/Textured	Unknown — not stated by the source
Heavy metals freeDiffers	Hg (mercury), Pb (lead)	Pb (lead), Hg (mercury)
Monitor sync input signalKnown for one	Separate Sync; Sync on Green	Unknown — not stated by the source
Signal inputKnown for one	VGA (Analog )	Unknown — not stated by the source
CertificationDiffers	BSMI, CCC, CE Mark, SEMKO, GOST, TUV/GS, TUV Ergo, UL/cUL, FCC Class B, PSB, SASO, WEEE	RoHS BSMI CE Mark FCC Class B GOST SASO SEMKO TCO 5.2 TUV Ergo TUV/GS UL/cUL WEEE
Regulatory ApprovalsKnown for one	BSMI; CCC; CE Mark; SEMKO; GOST; TUV/GS; TUV Ergo; UL/cUL; FCC Class B; PSB; SASO; WEEE	Unknown — not stated by the source
User controlsKnown for one	Auto; 4:3 / Wide; Brightness; Menu; Power On/Off	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display viewable area (HxV)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	509.18 x 286.41 mm
Effective viewing areaKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	509.18 x 286.41 mm
Package weightKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	5.84 kg
Power consumption (economy mode)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	15.3 W
Picture enhancementKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	SmartImage
Supplied AC adapter typeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	LCD
Recycling data1 differ
Overall recyclability rateDiffers	100%	25%

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons