Product comparison · 2 monitors

Philips 160EL1SB/94 computer monitor vs Philips 191EL2SB/94 computer monitor

Add a product
  • 71specifications compared
  • 29differ
  • 42identical
  • 14known for one product only

Key differences

  • Display diagonal
    • 160EL1SB/94 computer monitor:39.6 cm (15.6")
    • 191EL2SB/94 computer monitor:47 cm (18.5")
  • Response time
    • 160EL1SB/94 computer monitor:8 ms
    • 191EL2SB/94 computer monitor:5 ms
  • Contrast ratio (dynamic)
    • 160EL1SB/94 computer monitor:1000000:1
    • 191EL2SB/94 computer monitor:20000000:1
  • Viewing angle, horizontal
    • 160EL1SB/94 computer monitor:110°
    • 191EL2SB/94 computer monitor:176°
  • Viewing angle, vertical
    • 160EL1SB/94 computer monitor:85°
    • 191EL2SB/94 computer monitor:170°
  • Pixel pitch
    • 160EL1SB/94 computer monitor:0.252 x 0.252 mm
    • 191EL2SB/94 computer monitor:0.30 x 0.30 mm
  • DVI port
    • 160EL1SB/94 computer monitor:No
    • 191EL2SB/94 computer monitor:Yes
  • VESA mounting
    • 160EL1SB/94 computer monitor:Yes
    • 191EL2SB/94 computer monitor:No

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (on)
Comparison of 160EL1SB/94, 191EL2SB/94
85 specifications
Display6 differ
Display diagonalDiffers39.6 cm (15.6")47 cm (18.5")
Response timeDiffers8 ms5 ms
Contrast ratio (dynamic)Differs1000000:120000000:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers110°176°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers85°170°
Pixel pitchDiffers0.252 x 0.252 mm0.30 x 0.30 mm
Display panel sizeKnown for one15.6 inch / 39.6 cmUnknown — not stated by the source
Dynamic contrast ratio marketing nameKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSmartContrast
Ports & interfaces1 differ
DVI portDiffersNoYes
DVI-D ports quantityKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source1
HDCPKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Ergonomics4 differ
VESA mountingDiffersYesNo
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one75 x 75 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Tilt angle rangeDiffers-5 - 20°-3 - 12°
On Screen Display (OSD) languagesDiffersSimplified Chinese, English, Spanish, French, Korean, Portuguese, RussianSimplified Chinese, German, English, Spanish, French, Italian, Portuguese, Russian, Turkish
Number of OSD languagesDiffers79
Power2 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs9.5 W13.9 W
Power consumption (standby)Differs0.8 W0.5 W
AC input voltageKnown for one100 - 240 VUnknown — not stated by the source
AC input frequencyKnown for one50 - 60 HzUnknown — not stated by the source
Weight & dimensions8 differ
Dimensions (W x D x H) with standKnown for one303 x 376 x 156 mmUnknown — not stated by the source
Width (with stand)Differs303 mm338 mm
Depth (with stand)Differs156 mm189 mm
Height (with stand)Differs376 mm457 mm
Weight (with stand)Differs2.7 kg2.38 kg
Width (without stand)Differs244 mm293 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs59 mm41 mm
Height (without stand)Differs376 mm457 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs2.51 kg2.22 kg
Packaging data5 differ
Package dimensions (WxDxH)Differs323 x 439 x 145 mm383 x 503 x 125 mm
Package widthDiffers323 mm503 mm
Package depthDiffers145 mm125 mm
Package heightDiffers439 mm383 mm
Package weightDiffers4.08 kg3.58 kg
Other features3 differ
Heavy metals freeKnown for oneHg (mercury)Unknown — not stated by the source
Package weightKnown for one4.08 kgUnknown — not stated by the source
Mean time between failures (MTBF)Differs40000 h30000 h
CertificationDiffersCE Mark, FCC, Class B, UL/cULRoHS, CE Mark, FCC, Class B, UL/cUL, BSMI, GOST
Supplied AC adapter typeDiffersLCDLED
Picture enhancementKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceSmartImage Lite
Performanceidentical
Windows operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Mac operating systems supportedKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceYes
Recycling dataidentical
Packaging recyclability rateKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100%

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons