Product comparison · 2 monitors

NEC LCD3090WQXI-BK computer monitor vs NEC Widescreen Desktop LCD Display

21specifications compared
14differ
7identical
23known for one product only

Key differences

Display diagonal
- LCD3090WQXI-BK computer monitor:76.2 cm (30")
- Widescreen Desktop LCD Display:48.3 cm (19")
Display resolution
- LCD3090WQXI-BK computer monitor:2560 x 1600 pixels
- Widescreen Desktop LCD Display:1440 x 900 pixels
Display brightness (typical)
- LCD3090WQXI-BK computer monitor:350 cd/m²
- Widescreen Desktop LCD Display:300 cd/m²
Response time
- LCD3090WQXI-BK computer monitor:6 ms
- Widescreen Desktop LCD Display:5 ms
Viewing angle, horizontal
- LCD3090WQXI-BK computer monitor:178°
- Widescreen Desktop LCD Display:176°
Viewing angle, vertical
- LCD3090WQXI-BK computer monitor:178°
- Widescreen Desktop LCD Display:176°
Built-in speaker(s)
- LCD3090WQXI-BK computer monitor:No
- Widescreen Desktop LCD Display:Yes
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantity
- LCD3090WQXI-BK computer monitor:0
- Widescreen Desktop LCD Display:1

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only

Comparison of LCD3090WQXI-BK, Widescreen Desktop LCD Display
44 specifications	A NEC LCD3090WQXI-BK computer monitor Model LCD3090WQXI-BK View product	B NEC Widescreen Desktop LCD Display View product
Display6 differ
Display diagonalDiffers	76.2 cm (30")	48.3 cm (19")
Display resolutionDiffers	2560 x 1600 pixels	1440 x 900 pixels
Display brightness (typical)Differs	350 cd/m²	300 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers	6 ms	5 ms
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers	178°	176°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers	178°	176°
Horizontal scan rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	31.5 - 81.1 kHz
Vertical scan rangeKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	56 - 76 Hz
Colour gamut standardKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	sRGB
Separate H/V syncKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Video input impedanceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	75 Ω
Native aspect ratioKnown for one	16:10	Unknown — not stated by the source
Aspect ratioKnown for one	16:10	Unknown — not stated by the source
Display number of coloursKnown for one	16.78 million colours	Unknown — not stated by the source
Pixel pitchKnown for one	0.251 x 0.251 mm	Unknown — not stated by the source
Digital horizontal frequencyKnown for one	24 - 98.7 kHz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Digital vertical frequencyKnown for one	50 - 85 Hz	Unknown — not stated by the source
Multimedia1 differ
Built-in speaker(s)Differs	No	Yes
Ports & interfaces2 differ
VGA (D-Sub) ports quantityDiffers	0	1
DVI-D ports quantityDiffers	2	1
USB Type-A downstream ports quantityKnown for one	0	Unknown — not stated by the source
HDCPKnown for one	Yes	Unknown — not stated by the source
Ergonomicsidentical
Panel mounting interfaceKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	100 x 100 mm
Plug and PlayKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	Yes
Power1 differ
Power consumption (typical)Differs	143 W	41 W
Power consumption (PowerSave)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	2 W
Operational conditionsidentical
Storage temperature (T-T)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	-10 - 80 °C
Storage relative humidity (H-H)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	10 - 85%
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Width (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	439.4 mm
Depth (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	209.8 mm
Height (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	347.1 mm
Weight (with stand)Known for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	4.6 kg
Width (without stand)Differs	687 mm	439.4 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs	343 mm	64.6 mm
Height (without stand)Differs	668 mm	299.8 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs	19.1 kg	4.3 kg
Sustainabilityidentical
Sustainability certificatesKnown for one	Unknown — not stated by the source	ENERGY STAR

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons