Product comparison · 2 monitors

NEC LCD1550M-bk 15" TFT .297 60kHz TC099 vs Philips 150S4FG 15IN TFT ANA

Add a product
  • 19specifications compared
  • 13differ
  • 6identical
  • 10known for one product only

Key differences

The NEC LCD1550M-bk 15" TFT .297 60kHz TC099 has 50 cd/m² more display brightness (typical) than the Philips 150S4FG 15IN TFT ANA (300 cd/m² vs 250 cd/m²). The NEC LCD1550M-bk 15" TFT .297 60kHz TC099 has 10 ms more response time than the Philips 150S4FG 15IN TFT ANA (40 ms vs 30 ms). The NEC LCD1550M-bk 15" TFT .297 60kHz TC099 has 50 :1 more contrast ratio (typical) than the Philips 150S4FG 15IN TFT ANA (450:1 vs 400:1). Horizontal scan range: 31 - 60 kHz on the NEC LCD1550M-bk 15" TFT .297 60kHz TC099, 30 - 61 kHz on the Philips 150S4FG 15IN TFT ANA. Vertical scan range: 56.2 - 75.1 Hz on the NEC LCD1550M-bk 15" TFT .297 60kHz TC099, 56 - 76 Hz on the Philips 150S4FG 15IN TFT ANA.

  • Display brightness (typical)
    • LCD1550M-bk 15" TFT .297 60kHz TC099:300 cd/m²
    • 150S4FG 15IN TFT ANA:250 cd/m²
  • Response time
    • LCD1550M-bk 15" TFT .297 60kHz TC099:40 ms
    • 150S4FG 15IN TFT ANA:30 ms
  • Contrast ratio (typical)
    • LCD1550M-bk 15" TFT .297 60kHz TC099:450:1
    • 150S4FG 15IN TFT ANA:400:1
  • Viewing angle, horizontal
    • LCD1550M-bk 15" TFT .297 60kHz TC099:120°
    • 150S4FG 15IN TFT ANA:150°
  • Viewing angle, vertical
    • LCD1550M-bk 15" TFT .297 60kHz TC099:100°
    • 150S4FG 15IN TFT ANA:110°
  • Horizontal scan range
    • LCD1550M-bk 15" TFT .297 60kHz TC099:31 - 60 kHz
    • 150S4FG 15IN TFT ANA:30 - 61 kHz
  • Vertical scan range
    • LCD1550M-bk 15" TFT .297 60kHz TC099:56.2 - 75.1 Hz
    • 150S4FG 15IN TFT ANA:56 - 76 Hz
  • Operating relative humidity (H-H)
    • LCD1550M-bk 15" TFT .297 60kHz TC099:30 - 80%
    • 150S4FG 15IN TFT ANA:20 - 80%

Side by side

Differences highlightedShow differences only (off)
Comparison of LCD1550M-bk 15" TFT .297 60kHz TC099, 150S4FG 15IN TFT ANA
29 specifications
Display7 differ
Display diagonal38.1 cm (15")38.1 cm (15")
Display resolution1024 x 768 pixels1024 x 768 pixels
TouchscreenNoNo
Display brightness (typical)Differs300 cd/m²250 cd/m²
Response timeDiffers40 ms30 ms
Contrast ratio (typical)Differs450:1400:1
Viewing angle, horizontalDiffers120°150°
Viewing angle, verticalDiffers100°110°
Display number of coloursKnown for one16.78 million coloursUnknown — not stated by the source
Pixel pitch0.2970.297
Horizontal scan rangeDiffers31 - 60 kHz30 - 61 kHz
Vertical scan rangeDiffers56.2 - 75.1 Hz56 - 76 Hz
Viewable size, horizontal30.4 cm30.4 cm
Viewable size, vertical22.8 cm22.8 cm
Surface treatmentKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceAnti-glare polarizer, hard coating
Ergonomicsidentical
Plug and PlayKnown for oneYesUnknown — not stated by the source
Operational conditions1 differ
Operating relative humidity (H-H)Differs30 - 80%20 - 80%
Maximum operating temperature range (T-T)Known for one5 - 35 °CUnknown — not stated by the source
Operating temperature (T-T)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source5 - 40 °C
Weight & dimensions4 differ
Width (without stand)Differs345.2 mm343 mm
Depth (without stand)Differs162 mm179 mm
Height (without stand)Differs362.6 mm310 mm
Weight (without stand)Differs4.5 kg3.7 kg
Packaging contentidentical
Bundled softwareKnown for oneDrivers & UtilitiesUnknown — not stated by the source
Other features1 differ
Audio systemKnown for oneMultimedia: 1-Watt Speaker; headphone jackUnknown — not stated by the source
CertificationDiffersCE; TÜV GS; TÜV ERGONOMIE; UL/C-UL; FCC Class B; ISO 13406; TCO 99;MPR II; Ctick; PCBC/B-Mark; EnergyStar; Energy 2000TCO99
Power requirementsKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the source100 – 240 VAC, 50/60 Hz
Supplied AC adapter typeKnown for oneUnknown — not stated by the sourceLCD
Poweridentical
Power consumption (typical)Known for oneUnknown — not stated by the source18 W

A dash means the value is not stated by the source. Unknown values are never counted for or against a product, and there is no overall score.

More monitor comparisons

All monitor comparisons